On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 1:29 AM, Shoaib Meenai wrote:
> Do you think it's worth also checking for the presence of cxxabi.h and
> assuming the Itanium ABI if it's found, since the MS ABI shouldn't be using
> any ABI library?
>
No I don't think we should check for `cxxabi.h`.It's
Do you think it's worth also checking for the presence of cxxabi.h and
assuming the Itanium ABI if it's found, since the MS ABI shouldn't be using
any ABI library?
(_LIBCPP_BUILDING_HAS_NO_ABI_LIBRARY would have been ideal were it available
persistently rather than only during the build of libc++
Author: ericwf
Date: Fri Jan 6 20:43:58 2017
New Revision: 291329
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=291329=rev
Log:
Add _LIBCPP_ABI_[ITANIUM|MICROSOFT] macros.
This patch adds a libc++ configuration macro for the ABI we
are targeting, either Itanium or Microsoft. For now we configure