https://github.com/AlexVlx edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76955
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4135,6 +4283,33 @@ Code object V5 metadata is the same as
== == =
+.. _amdgpu-amdhsa-code-object-metadata-v6:
+
+Code Object V6 Metadata
+
+.. warning::
+ Code object
@@ -787,11 +788,15 @@ enum : unsigned {
EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_GFX942= 0x04c,
EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_RESERVED_0X4D = 0x04d,
EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_GFX1201 = 0x04e,
+ EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_GFX9_GENERIC = 0x04f,
kzhuravl wrote:
If you
Pierre-vh wrote:
@arsenm Hi, can you take a look - especially on the testing? I don't know if
this is tested well enough
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76955
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Pierre-vh wrote:
Note: testing is a bit light for now, I'd like to add more tests, but I'm not
sure what kind of tests are worth adding.
I could just add a generic target run line wherever gfx9/10/11 run lines are
present, but that seems a bit overkill? I'd need to change half the tests we
