https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM modulo one small comment in the test. Thanks for getting this done so
quickly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75542
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75542
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aeubanks edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75542
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aeubanks edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75542
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aeubanks updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75542
>From 884347b73d68e2d469b3903f248e72921434 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Eubanks
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:41:31 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Instrumentation][X86] Limit setting large section flag
ilovepi wrote:
well I guess I should say I thought it would be reliable rather than available,
but I see why it wouldn't be.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75542
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ilovepi wrote:
> Actually I'm going to go down the `Module::getCodeModel()` route. Right now I
> think frontends adding module metadata for the code model is probably not
> common, but we should aim for that. And this will in the short term still
> work for Fuchsia without breaking API for
aeubanks wrote:
Actually I'm going to go down the `Module::getCodeModel()` route. Right now I
think frontends adding module metadata for the code model is probably not
common, but we should aim for that. And this will in the short term still work
for Fuchsia without breaking API for other
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: Arthur Eubanks (aeubanks)
Changes
In #74514 and #74778 we marked various instrumentation-added
sections as
large. This causes an extra PT_LOAD segment if using the small code
model. Since people using the small code model
https://github.com/aeubanks created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75542
In #74514 and #74778 we marked various instrumentation-added sections as
large. This causes an extra PT_LOAD segment if using the small code
model. Since people using the small code model presumably aren't
10 matches
Mail list logo
