On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> C11 6.7.6.3p15: "In the determination of type compatibility and of a
> composite type, each parameter declared with function or array type is taken
> as having the adjusted type and each parameter declared with qualified type
> is taken as ha
C11 6.7.6.3p15: "In the determination of type compatibility and of a
composite type, each parameter declared with function or array type is
taken as having the adjusted type and each parameter declared with
qualified type is taken as having the unqualified version of its declared
type."
So "int f(
I've run into a case where I am calling ASTContext::getFunctionType()
and getting a failed assertion because a parameter we thought we
canonicalized isn't actually canonical. The function is declared as:
extern int regexec (int __pmatch[__restrict]);
When we call getCanonicalParamType() on that p
