Re: [PATCH] D18138: Add -fnative-half-arguments-and-returns

2016-05-20 Thread Pirama Arumuga Nainar via cfe-commits
pirama added inline comments. Comment at: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp:5109 @@ -5108,3 +5108,3 @@ // natively, and does not need to interwork with AAPCS code. - if (Ty->isHalfType() && !getContext().getLangOpts().OpenCL) { + if (Ty->isHalfType() &&

Re: [PATCH] D18138: Add -fnative-half-arguments-and-returns

2016-05-20 Thread Anastasia Stulova via cfe-commits
Anastasia added a subscriber: Anastasia. Anastasia added a comment. Has this commit been merged without being approved by all the reviewers? Comment at: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp:5109 @@ -5108,3 +5108,3 @@ // natively, and does not need to interwork with AAPCS

Re: [PATCH] D18138: Add -fnative-half-arguments-and-returns

2016-03-19 Thread Oliver Stannard via cfe-commits
olista01 accepted this revision. olista01 added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. LGTM http://reviews.llvm.org/D18138 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

Re: [PATCH] D18138: Add -fnative-half-arguments-and-returns

2016-03-19 Thread Pirama Arumuga Nainar via cfe-commits
pirama added a comment. Thanks for the review! Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D18138 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Re: [PATCH] D18138: Add -fnative-half-arguments-and-returns

2016-03-18 Thread Pirama Arumuga Nainar via cfe-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL263795: Add -fnative-half-arguments-and-returns (authored by pirama). Changed prior to commit: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18138?vs=50564=51036#toc Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D18138

Re: [PATCH] D18138: Add -fnative-half-arguments-and-returns

2016-03-15 Thread Stephen Hines via cfe-commits
srhines added a reviewer: kristof.beyls. srhines added a comment. Kristof, can you or someone at ARM (where this is clearly relevant) take a look here? The CL obviously looks fine to me, but I might not have all of the original context as to why this was so constrained to OpenCL. Thanks.