Sorry for the delay, the past couple of weeks have been crazy with C++
committee stuff. Should be fixed in r263449.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits
wrote:
> If not addressing the issue with '-fmodule-name' could you revert removal
If not addressing the issue with '-fmodule-name' could you revert removal of
original ‘-fmodule-implementation-of’ since we are depending on it ?
> On Mar 3, 2016, at 6:13 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>
> Hey Richard,
>
> -fmodule-name emits
On 3 Mar 2016 3:18 a.m., "Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits" <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Mind if we keep -fmodule-implementation-of as an alias so that we can
gradually transition to -fmodule-name ?
Sure, no problem.
> > On Feb 19, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits <
Mind if we keep -fmodule-implementation-of as an alias so that we can gradually
transition to -fmodule-name ?
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>
> Author: rsmith
> Date: Fri Feb 19 16:25:36 2016
> New Revision: 261372
>
> URL: