Re: r261372 - [modules] Flatten -fmodule-name= and -fmodule-implementation-of= into a single

2016-03-14 Thread Richard Smith via cfe-commits
Sorry for the delay, the past couple of weeks have been crazy with C++ committee stuff. Should be fixed in r263449. On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits wrote: > If not addressing the issue with '-fmodule-name' could you revert removal

Re: r261372 - [modules] Flatten -fmodule-name= and -fmodule-implementation-of= into a single

2016-03-14 Thread Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits
If not addressing the issue with '-fmodule-name' could you revert removal of original ‘-fmodule-implementation-of’ since we are depending on it ? > On Mar 3, 2016, at 6:13 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Hey Richard, > > -fmodule-name emits

Re: r261372 - [modules] Flatten -fmodule-name= and -fmodule-implementation-of= into a single

2016-03-03 Thread Richard Smith via cfe-commits
On 3 Mar 2016 3:18 a.m., "Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Mind if we keep -fmodule-implementation-of as an alias so that we can gradually transition to -fmodule-name ? Sure, no problem. > > On Feb 19, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits <

Re: r261372 - [modules] Flatten -fmodule-name= and -fmodule-implementation-of= into a single

2016-03-03 Thread Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits
Mind if we keep -fmodule-implementation-of as an alias so that we can gradually transition to -fmodule-name ? > On Feb 19, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Author: rsmith > Date: Fri Feb 19 16:25:36 2016 > New Revision: 261372 > > URL: