Re: r284960 - [analyzer] Add StdLibraryFunctions checker.

Thanks! Should get better with r285000. On 10/24/16 9:34 PM, Evgenii Stepanov wrote: This code also fails with UBSan: tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp:285:62: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 9223372036854775807 + 1 cannot be represented in type

Re: r284960 - [analyzer] Add StdLibraryFunctions checker.

This code also fails with UBSan: tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp:285:62: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 9223372036854775807 + 1 cannot be represented in type 'long' #0 0x5e1642f in (anonymous

Re: r284960 - [analyzer] Add StdLibraryFunctions checker.

On 24 October 2016 at 14:09, Artem Dergachev wrote: > Strange, i'm not receiving any buildbot emails again. Will look through bots > manually next time, that doesn't sound too hard. Pushed a hotfix in r284969. The buildmaster was restarted this weekend and got all old builds

Re: r284960 - [analyzer] Add StdLibraryFunctions checker.

Strange, i'm not receiving any buildbot emails again. Will look through bots manually next time, that doesn't sound too hard. Pushed a hotfix in r284969. On 10/24/16 3:08 PM, Renato Golin wrote: On 24 October 2016 at 10:41, Artem Dergachev via cfe-commits wrote:

Re: r284960 - [analyzer] Add StdLibraryFunctions checker.

On 24 October 2016 at 10:41, Artem Dergachev via cfe-commits wrote: > Author: dergachev > Date: Mon Oct 24 04:41:38 2016 > New Revision: 284960 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=284960=rev > Log: > [analyzer] Add StdLibraryFunctions checker. Hi Artem,

r284960 - [analyzer] Add StdLibraryFunctions checker.

Author: dergachev Date: Mon Oct 24 04:41:38 2016 New Revision: 284960 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=284960=rev Log: [analyzer] Add StdLibraryFunctions checker. This checker does not emit reports, however it influences the analysis by providing complete summaries for, or otherwise