On 17 April 2017 at 14:41, Vassil Vassilev wrote:
> + Richard
>
> Thanks for the example. We've seen similar issue with inlines (without the
> reverted patch). My guess this patch exposed it.
>
> It is not clear to me why we think the declaration is a definition there...
+ Richard
Thanks for the example. We've seen similar issue with inlines (without
the reverted patch). My guess this patch exposed it.
It is not clear to me why we think the declaration is a definition there...
On 17/04/17 23:10, Benjamin Kramer via cfe-commits wrote:
This broke our internal
Thanks, I will look into this.
בתאריך יום ג׳, 18 באפר׳ 2017 ב-0:11 מאת Benjamin Kramer <
benny@gmail.com>:
> This broke our internal build of libc++ with modules. Reduced test
> case attached, courtesy of Richard Smith!
>
> With your patch it doesn't compiler anymore:
> While
This broke our internal build of libc++ with modules. Reduced test
case attached, courtesy of Richard Smith!
With your patch it doesn't compiler anymore:
While building module 'x':
In file included from :2:
In file included from ./c.h:1:
./a.h:3:32: error: inline declaration of 'f' follows
Author: yrnkrn
Date: Mon Apr 17 03:51:20 2017
New Revision: 300443
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=300443=rev
Log:
Address http://bugs.llvm.org/pr30994 so that a non-friend can properly replace
a friend, and a visible friend can properly replace an invisible friend but not
vice