Ping
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 7:58 PM David Blaikie wrote:
> Ping
>
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 11:28 AM David Blaikie wrote:
>
>> Hey Richard - was just going back over some of the modular codegen code
>> (due to a discussion on the EWG mailing list about file extensions that
>> ended up touching
Ping
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 11:28 AM David Blaikie wrote:
> Hey Richard - was just going back over some of the modular codegen code
> (due to a discussion on the EWG mailing list about file extensions that
> ended up touching on the nature of how modules are built) - and I came
> across this cod
Hey Richard - was just going back over some of the modular codegen code
(due to a discussion on the EWG mailing list about file extensions that
ended up touching on the nature of how modules are built) - and I came
across this code & had the same question I see I wrote up here already but
got lost
Looks good - does this support available_externally definitions of strong
external linkage functions in the users of a module? (is that tested?)
Should it?
Also should we consider having two flags for modular codegen - one for
correctness (external function definitions), one for linkage size
optim
Author: rsmith
Date: Wed Jul 5 17:30:00 2017
New Revision: 307232
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=307232&view=rev
Log:
[modules ts] Do not emit strong function definitions from the module interface
unit in every user.
Added:
cfe/trunk/test/CXX/modules-ts/basic/basic.def.odr/
