Re: r325375 - [MS] Make constexpr static data members implicitly inline

2018-02-20 Thread Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
Reverted in r325576 due to PR36453, and merged the revert to 6.0 in r325577. On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > Merged to 6.0 in r325500. > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Reid Kleckner via cfe-commits > wrote: >> Author: rnk >> Date: Fri Feb 16 11:44:47 2018 >> New Revis

r325576 - Revert r325375 "[MS] Make constexpr static data members implicitly inline"

2018-02-20 Thread Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
Author: hans Date: Tue Feb 20 04:43:02 2018 New Revision: 325576 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=325576&view=rev Log: Revert r325375 "[MS] Make constexpr static data members implicitly inline" This broke Clang bootstrap on Windows, PR36453. > This handles them exa

Re: r325375 - [MS] Make constexpr static data members implicitly inline

2018-02-19 Thread Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
Merged to 6.0 in r325500. On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Reid Kleckner via cfe-commits wrote: > Author: rnk > Date: Fri Feb 16 11:44:47 2018 > New Revision: 325375 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=325375&view=rev > Log: > [MS] Make constexpr static data members implicitly inline

r325375 - [MS] Make constexpr static data members implicitly inline

2018-02-16 Thread Reid Kleckner via cfe-commits
Author: rnk Date: Fri Feb 16 11:44:47 2018 New Revision: 325375 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=325375&view=rev Log: [MS] Make constexpr static data members implicitly inline This handles them exactly the same way that we handle const integral static data members with inline definiti