Yeah, something about linkage - but that's not the part that's as likely to
be a problem as the other part: the other test for C++ language was what
causes LLVM to compute the fully qualified name of an entity in the
accelerator table ("foo::bar" instead of just "bar" (eg: the bug was things
like
>> On Oct 1, 2019, at 6:40 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>>
>> This broke gnu_pubnames and other forms of DWARF index of C++ code - fixed
>> in r373420 (feel free to post-comimt review, etc, of course)
>>
>
patch for reference:
>case dwarf::DW_TAG_union_type:
>case
Out of curiosity, should/would this've shown up for you Apple folks too?
(as a failure in the apple/lldb accelerator tables - because the names
would be similarly incorrect) had it just not got to the necessary testing
yet?
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:29 AM Adrian Prantl wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 1,
> On Oct 1, 2019, at 6:40 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
> This broke gnu_pubnames and other forms of DWARF index of C++ code - fixed in
> r373420 (feel free to post-comimt review, etc, of course)
>
Thanks!
-- adrian
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 5:36 PM Adrian Prantl via cfe-commits
>
This broke gnu_pubnames and other forms of DWARF index of C++ code - fixed
in r373420 (feel free to post-comimt review, etc, of course)
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 5:36 PM Adrian Prantl via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: adrian
> Date: Mon Sep 23 17:38:49 2019
> New
Author: adrian
Date: Mon Sep 23 17:38:49 2019
New Revision: 372681
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=372681=rev
Log:
Support for DWARF-5 C++ language tags.
This patch provides support for DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11,
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 tags in the Clang C++ frontend.
Patch by Sourabh
