This looks like a change to clang - could you test it in clang (& review it
on cfe-commits instead of llvm-commits)?
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:57 AM, David Li via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> davidxl created this revision.
> davidxl added a reviewer: vsk.
> davidxl added
* H.J. Lu [2016-02-08 11:24:53 -0800]:
> I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent
> modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/linux-abi
>
> I will start to document
On 8 February 2016 at 19:23, Richard Smith wrote:
> "POD for the purpose of layout" is defined in the Itanium C++ ABI here:
>
> http://mentorembedded.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#definitions
Thanks. So there's no problem using "POD for the purposes of layout",
and the change to "POD for the
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 8 February 2016 at 19:23, Richard Smith wrote:
>> "POD for the purpose of layout" is defined in the Itanium C++ ABI here:
>>
>> http://mentorembedded.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#definitions
>
> Thanks. So there's
erik.pilkington updated this revision to Diff 47240.
erik.pilkington added a comment.
Thanks! This update fixes everything you brought up.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16930
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
test/CXX/over/over.oper/over.literal/p5.cpp
jbcoe planned changes to this revision.
jbcoe added a comment.
Placeholder handling needs correcting.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16962
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
beanz created this revision.
beanz added a reviewer: bogner.
beanz added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This commit re-lands r259862. The underlying cause of the build breakage was an
incorrectly written capabilities test. In tools/Driver/CMakeLists.txt I was
attempting to check if a linker flag
ariccio added a comment.
One of two comments addressed, one question asked.
Comment at: llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/MemRegion.cpp:792
@@ +791,3 @@
+
+const MemRegion* MemRegionManager::getMemSpaceForLocalVariable(const VarDecl
*D, llvm::PointerUnion ) {
+ const
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> > On 8 February 2016 at 19:23, Richard Smith wrote:
> >> "POD for the purpose of layout" is defined in the Itanium C++ ABI here:
> >>
> >>
rsmith added a comment.
Thanks, this looks good. I think we can make the control flow a little more
obvious by moving the `return true;`s right after we emit each diagnostic, and
that also lets us remove the `goto`.
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:11769
@@ +11768,3 @@
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Jonathan Wakely
>> wrote:
>> > On 8 February 2016 at 19:23, Richard Smith wrote:
>>
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Xinliang David Li via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: davidxl
> Date: Mon Feb 8 13:14:14 2016
> New Revision: 260126
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260126=rev
> Log:
> Simplify test cases
>
It's handy to mention that
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Jonathan Wakely via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 8 February 2016 at 18:31, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >> On 8 February 2016 at 18:26,
thakis added a comment.
ping :-)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:25 AM, David Li via llvm-commits <
llvm-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> davidxl updated this revision to Diff 47217.
> davidxl added a comment.
>
> Simplified test case suggested by Vedant.
>
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D16947
>
> Files:
> lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
>
On 08/02/16 20:38, Richard Smith wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Vassil Vassilev
> wrote:
On 08/02/16 20:10, Richard Smith via cfe-commits wrote:
Author: rsmith
Date: Mon Feb 8 13:10:14 2016
New
rsmith added a comment.
Can we implement all of DR253 instead? (That is, don't restrict this change to
libstdc++'s types.) We don't have precise wording for DR253 yet, but do have
the guidance that "if the implicit default constructor initializes all
subobjects, no initializer should be
* H. J. Lu:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * H. J. Lu:
>>
>>> I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent
>>> modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface:
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:39 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:25 AM, David Li via llvm-commits
> wrote:
>>
>> davidxl updated this revision to Diff 47217.
>> davidxl added a comment.
>>
>> Simplified test case suggested by
Author: davidxl
Date: Mon Feb 8 13:14:14 2016
New Revision: 260126
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260126=rev
Log:
Simplify test cases
Modified:
cfe/trunk/test/Profile/def-ctors.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/Profile/def-dtors.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Profile/def-ctors.cpp
URL:
Author: rsmith
Date: Mon Feb 8 13:10:14 2016
New Revision: 260124
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260124=rev
Log:
Remove dead code.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
URL:
On 08/02/16 20:10, Richard Smith via cfe-commits wrote:
Author: rsmith
Date: Mon Feb 8 13:10:14 2016
New Revision: 260124
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260124=rev
Log:
Remove dead code.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
Modified:
Both cfe-commits and llvm-commits are cc'ed.
David
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:29 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
> This looks like a change to clang - could you test it in clang (& review it
> on cfe-commits instead of llvm-commits)?
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:57 AM, David Li via
vsk updated this revision to Diff 47230.
vsk added a comment.
- Check that we don't crash on a nested 'STMT' test case.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16934
Files:
lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp
test/CoverageMapping/macro-expressions.cpp
Index: test/CoverageMapping/macro-expressions.cpp
Author: vedantk
Date: Mon Feb 8 13:25:45 2016
New Revision: 260129
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260129=rev
Log:
[Coverage] Fix crash when handling certain macro expansions
When handling 'if' statements, we crash if the condition and the consequent
branch are spanned by a single
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL260129: [Coverage] Fix crash when handling certain macro
expansions (authored by vedantk).
Changed prior to commit:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16934?vs=47230=47232#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Vassil Vassilev
wrote:
> On 08/02/16 20:10, Richard Smith via cfe-commits wrote:
>
>> Author: rsmith
>> Date: Mon Feb 8 13:10:14 2016
>> New Revision: 260124
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260124=rev
>> Log:
>> Remove
ah, right, sorry about that - gmail didn't render cfe-commits on the to
line in the first email... weird.
Anyway, no need to include llvm-commits on clang-only changes.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Xinliang David Li
wrote:
> Both cfe-commits and llvm-commits are cc'ed.
rsmith added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16552#346678, @thakis wrote:
> Will do, thanks! In "If the implicit default constructor initializes all
> subobjects, no initializer should be required", is "initializes all
> subobjects meant recursively?
I think so, or more specifically,
vsk updated this revision to Diff 47229.
vsk added a comment.
- Made the check a bit more general by moving it to `propagateCounts`.
- Added 3 more tests.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16934
Files:
lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp
test/CoverageMapping/macro-expressions.cpp
Index:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * H. J. Lu:
>
>> I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent
>> modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface:
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/linux-abi
Hi,
I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent
modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface:
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/linux-abi
I will start to document existing Linux extensions, like STT_GNU_IFUNC.
I will propose some new
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * H.J. Lu [2016-02-08 11:24:53 -0800]:
>> I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent
>> modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface:
>>
>>
thakis added a comment.
Will do, thanks! In "If the implicit default constructor initializes all
subobjects, no initializer should be required", is "initializes all subobjects
meant recursively? I.e. is this ok according to that language?
`
struct Inner {
Inner() = default;
int i;
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * H. J. Lu:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * H. J. Lu:
>>>
I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent
modification and
davidxl updated this revision to Diff 47239.
davidxl added a comment.
Further simplify tests according to David B's comment.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16947
Files:
lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
test/Profile/def-assignop.cpp
Index: test/Profile/def-assignop.cpp
Author: nwilson
Date: Mon Feb 8 16:02:50 2016
New Revision: 260155
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260155=rev
Log:
[Concepts] Remove the IsConcept bit and associated member functions from VarDecl
because the information is now stored in TemplateDecl.
Modified:
xur updated this revision to Diff 47251.
xur marked an inline comment as done.
xur added a comment.
fixed the typo in comments
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15829
Files:
include/clang/Driver/CC1Options.td
include/clang/Frontend/CodeGenOptions.h
lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> Do we really need an 'empty type' special case?
>
> The x86_64 psABI already seems clear that empty types with size <= 16
> are not passed at all. Following the algorithm in section 3.2.3, each
> eightbyte is classified
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:46 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:40 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Richard Smith
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:49 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
>> Do we really need an 'empty type' special case?
>>
>> The x86_64 psABI already seems clear that empty types with size <= 16
>> are not passed at
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:46 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:40 PM, H.J. Lu
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:46 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Richard Smith
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL260160: This patch adds doxygen comments for all the
intrinsincs in the header fileā¦ (authored by kromanova).
Changed prior to commit:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16913?vs=46988=47250#toc
Repository:
Author: kromanova
Date: Mon Feb 8 16:35:09 2016
New Revision: 260160
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260160=rev
Log:
This patch adds doxygen comments for all the intrinsincs in the header file
pmmintrin.h. The doxygen comments are automatically generated based on Sony's
intrinsics
jbcoe removed rL LLVM as the repository for this revision.
jbcoe updated this revision to Diff 47247.
jbcoe added a comment.
Require C++14 for improved fixits.
Do not attempt to generate fixits for more complicated uses of bind.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16962
Files:
Author: davidxl
Date: Mon Feb 8 16:41:37 2016
New Revision: 260161
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260161=rev
Log:
[PGO] Cover more cases of implicitly generated C++ methods
Modified:
cfe/trunk/test/Profile/cxx-implicit.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Profile/cxx-implicit.cpp
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:40 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:05 PM, H.J. Lu
jbcoe updated this revision to Diff 47259.
jbcoe added a comment.
Moved check to readability module.
Aside: would it be worthwhile creating a python script to move checks from one
module to another?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16962
Files:
clang-tidy/readability/AvoidStdBindCheck.cpp
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:46 PM, H.J. Lu
Author: nico
Date: Mon Feb 8 16:23:09 2016
New Revision: 260159
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260159=rev
Log:
Make ParentMap work with explicit specializations of function templates.
For an explicit specialization, we first build a FunctionDecl, and then
we call SubstDecl() on it
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:40 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Jonathan Wakely
Do we really need an 'empty type' special case?
The x86_64 psABI already seems clear that empty types with size <= 16
are not passed at all. Following the algorithm in section 3.2.3, each
eightbyte is classified as NO_CLASS, and thus is not passed. So the
proposed change would only affect the
rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks great, thanks, do you need someone to commit this for you?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16930
___
cfe-commits mailing list
Thanks!
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Nico Weber via cfe-commits
wrote:
> Author: nico
> Date: Sun Feb 7 15:00:17 2016
> New Revision: 260056
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260056=rev
> Log:
> Disable failing nozlibcompress.c
>
> This test hasn't
alexfh added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16962#346822, @jbcoe wrote:
> Moved check to readability module.
>
> Aside: would it be worthwhile creating a python script to move checks from
> one module to another?
It's reasonable to teach the `rename_check.py` script move across
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:05 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Xinliang David Li
> wrote:
>>
>> To be clear, you are suggesting breaking the test into two (one for
>> copy, and one for move) ? I am totally fine with that.
>
>
>
eugenis added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16738#345696, @EricWF wrote:
> I prefer using the `(void*)` casts when possible. In particular when doing
> the pointer comparisons. Could you change those back to `void*` casts then
> use the `__as_base` function for the rest?
done
eugenis updated this revision to Diff 47271.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16738
Files:
include/__config
include/functional
Index: include/functional
===
--- include/functional
+++ include/functional
@@
erik.pilkington added a comment.
Yes I do, if you don't mind. Thanks for your help!
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16930
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Xinliang David Li
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:39 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:25 AM, David Li via llvm-commits
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> davidxl updated this
rnk accepted this revision.
rnk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
lgtm
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> I was referring to program properties:
> >>
> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/fyIXttIsYc8
> >
> > This looks more like an ELF topic to me, not really ABI.
> >
> > Please discuss this on a GNU project list because it affects the
> >
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:17 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Xinliang David Li
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:39 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:25 AM, David Li
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Xinliang David Li
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:17 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Xinliang David Li
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:39 AM, David
saugustine updated this revision to Diff 47267.
saugustine added a comment.
- Privatize all functions but getFullyQualifiedName.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15861
Files:
include/clang/Tooling/Core/QualTypeNames.h
lib/Tooling/Core/CMakeLists.txt
lib/Tooling/Core/QualTypeNames.cpp
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Xinliang David Li
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:17 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Xinliang
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Xinliang David Li
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Xinliang David Li
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:17 PM, David
Hey Tim,
Sorry about the breakage. I've reverted the commit in r260172. I'll make
sure that gnu_cxx::hash_map continues to work before recommitting.
/Eric
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Tim Northover
wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 6 February 2016 at 16:36, Eric Fiselier
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:49 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
>>> Do we really need an 'empty type' special case?
>>>
>>> The x86_64
Thanks for fixing this!
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Nico Weber via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: nico
> Date: Sun Feb 7 15:32:17 2016
> New Revision: 260058
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260058=rev
> Log:
> Make nozlibcompress.c pass and
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:01 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Richard Smith
Author: ericwf
Date: Mon Feb 8 17:47:13 2016
New Revision: 260172
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260172=rev
Log:
Revert r260012 due to __gnu_cxx::hash_map breakage
Removed:
libcxx/trunk/test/libcxx/containers/unord/key_value_traits.pass.cpp
rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
OK, let's go ahead with this approach for now; we can investigate replacing the
implementation with a `PrintingPolicy` flag later.
Comment at:
To be clear, you are suggesting breaking the test into two (one for
copy, and one for move) ? I am totally fine with that. I thought you
suggested removing the testing of move/op case because they might
share the same code path (clang's implementation) as the copy/op.
thanks,
David
On Mon, Feb
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Xinliang David Li
wrote:
> To be clear, you are suggesting breaking the test into two (one for
> copy, and one for move) ? I am totally fine with that.
Nah, no need to split the test case - we try to keep the number of test
files down (&
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Xinliang David Li
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:05 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Xinliang David Li
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> To be clear, you are suggesting
ha! somehow I kept thinking you are referring to implicit declared ctors.
From your test case, it is seems that the implicit copy/move op is
also broken and is fixed by this patch too. That means a missing test
case to me. Will update the case when verified.
thanks,
David
On Mon, Feb 8,
Author: rsmith
Date: Mon Feb 8 19:05:04 2016
New Revision: 260181
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260181=rev
Log:
Fix undefined behavior when compiling in C++14 due to sized operator delete
being called with the wrong size: convert CGFunctionInfo to use TrailingObjects
and ask
Hello everyone,
LLVM buildmaster will be updated and restarted after 6 PM Pacific time
today.
Thanks
Galina
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Xinliang David Li
wrote:
> ha! somehow I kept thinking you are referring to implicit declared ctors.
>
Ah, glad we figured out the disconnect - thanks for bearing with me!
>
> From your test case, it is seems that the implicit copy/move op
101 - 181 of 181 matches
Mail list logo