Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-04-09T09:53:58+08:00
New Revision: f7d93373969b2b757f5d5ef5e157dabe3bb9b0ae
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7d93373969b2b757f5d5ef5e157dabe3bb9b0ae
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7d93373969b2b757f5d5ef5e157dabe3bb9b0ae.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87996
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88071
>From c94d444b4317706c7434853c0c3490826bdbc110 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:10:37 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Offload][NFC] Remove `omp_` prefix from offloading entries
https://github.com/haonanya edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Pete Steinfeld (psteinfeld)
Changes
…irectory (#88007)"
This reverts commit 8671429151d5e67d3f21a737809953ae8bdfbfde.
This commit broke the flang build, so I'm reverting it. See the comments in
merge request #88007 for more
https://github.com/psteinfeld created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88083
…irectory (#88007)"
This reverts commit 8671429151d5e67d3f21a737809953ae8bdfbfde.
This commit broke the flang build, so I'm reverting it. See the comments in
merge request #88007 for more information.
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+// RUN: %clang -x c++ -fsanitize=implicit-bitfield-conversion -target
x86_64-linux -S -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-BITFIELD-CONVERSION
+// RUN: %clang -x c++ -fsanitize=implicit-integer-conversion -target
x86_64-linux -S
jhuber6 wrote:
> Hey, @jhuber. This change broke the flang build.
>
> When I revert the change, everything builds cleanly. So I reverted it in
> merge request #88083.
>
> After this change was added, I started getting messages like:
>
> ```
> [4/205] Building CXX object
>
jhuber6 wrote:
> Hey, @jhuber. This change broke the flang build.
>
> When I revert the change, everything builds cleanly. So I reverted it in
> merge request #88083.
>
> After this change was added, I started getting messages like:
>
> ```
> [4/205] Building CXX object
>
jhuber6 wrote:
> So the error is caused by your `c++` not supporting `__has_feature`
> presumably. However I have no clue why that would happen due to this patch. I
> believe in a few days @jdoerfert will flip the switch and we won't even allow
> `libomptarget` to be built without using the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
Fixes #87907.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88085.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp (+2-1)
- (modified)
https://github.com/danix800 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76619
>From 0ca1a2b2573d1f89a1b4d13cd43628a46c1e5c98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dingfei
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 00:32:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [ASTMatchers] fix captureVars assertion failure on
capturesVariables
danix800 wrote:
> LGTM but please add a release note so users know about the bug fix.
Release note added.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76619
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/danix800 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88014
>From fbd0780923d40b0d8290280731239a722a7af7a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dingfei
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 00:26:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AST][RecoveryExpr] Fix a crash on c89/c90 invalid
InitListExpr
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88085
Fixes #87907.
>From 0daef6caaac5d3779cda0d4cbbf9cd2514662b92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 20:29:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] instanceof is a keyword only in
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-04-09T08:51:36+03:00
New Revision: c7db450e5c1a83ea768765dcdedfd50f3358d418
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c7db450e5c1a83ea768765dcdedfd50f3358d418
DIFF:
Author: Vassil Vassilev
Date: 2024-04-09T07:14:43+03:00
New Revision: a30662fc2acdd73ca1a9217716299a4676999fb4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a30662fc2acdd73ca1a9217716299a4676999fb4
DIFF:
https://github.com/vgvassilev closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Sirraide wrote:
> I wanted to make you aware of this new core issue
> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2876.html (which i think we should
> have tests for). Thanks
So, as of now, this
```c++
using T = void ();
using U = int;
T a = delete ("hello");
U b = delete ("hello"), c, d = delete
@@ -268,17 +268,34 @@ class alignas(8) Decl {
/// }
/// void A::f(); // SemanticDC == namespace 'A'
///// LexicalDC == global namespace
- llvm::PointerUnion DeclCtx;
+ llvm::PointerIntPair<
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
+1 for more comments. I
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-04-09T07:04:35+02:00
New Revision: d4120477130a5f9e472753068dcc627baddc44f6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d4120477130a5f9e472753068dcc627baddc44f6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d4120477130a5f9e472753068dcc627baddc44f6.diff
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-04-09T07:55:36+02:00
New Revision: acff0b03167f877f783d9386014e1ebc20db1c2f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acff0b03167f877f783d9386014e1ebc20db1c2f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acff0b03167f877f783d9386014e1ebc20db1c2f.diff
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-04-09T07:55:37+02:00
New Revision: 11ba795565c231a95a7e34bb0e4dff099234c736
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/11ba795565c231a95a7e34bb0e4dff099234c736
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/11ba795565c231a95a7e34bb0e4dff099234c736.diff
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-04-09T07:55:36+02:00
New Revision: 5d1f779540517f47abb4927f4ded51cac94fd366
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5d1f779540517f47abb4927f4ded51cac94fd366
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5d1f779540517f47abb4927f4ded51cac94fd366.diff
Sirraide wrote:
I’ve also added a parser test for that as well just now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86526
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
CRobeck wrote:
Probably want to add a test in:
clang/test/CodeGenOpenCL/builtins-amdgcn-gfx12.cl
as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/haonanya edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Pete Steinfeld
Date: 2024-04-08T20:20:27-07:00
New Revision: 25e3d2b0fc1e2b4df19d7f18fbdd04c154e1d0e8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25e3d2b0fc1e2b4df19d7f18fbdd04c154e1d0e8
DIFF:
https://github.com/psteinfeld closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88083
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
This patch moves SYCL-related `Sema` functions into new `SemaSYCL` class,
following the recent example of OpenACC and HLSL. This is a part of the effort
to split `Sema`. Additional context can be
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88086
This patch moves SYCL-related `Sema` functions into new `SemaSYCL` class,
following the recent example of OpenACC and HLSL. This is a part of the effort
to split `Sema`. Additional context can be found in
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-04-08T21:20:18-07:00
New Revision: 5c056b32350e834924356b1af78504d261d24e42
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5c056b32350e834924356b1af78504d261d24e42
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5c056b32350e834924356b1af78504d261d24e42.diff
Author: Vassil Vassilev
Date: 2024-04-09T05:03:34Z
New Revision: 62e92573d28d62ab7e6438ac34d513b07c51ce09
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/62e92573d28d62ab7e6438ac34d513b07c51ce09
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/62e92573d28d62ab7e6438ac34d513b07c51ce09.diff
@@ -3369,6 +3369,59 @@ SDValue
PPCTargetLowering::LowerGlobalTLSAddressAIX(SDValue Op,
bool Is64Bit = Subtarget.isPPC64();
bool HasAIXSmallLocalExecTLS = Subtarget.hasAIXSmallLocalExecTLS();
TLSModel::Model Model = getTargetMachine().getTLSModel(GV);
+ // Initialize
@@ -3369,6 +3369,59 @@ SDValue
PPCTargetLowering::LowerGlobalTLSAddressAIX(SDValue Op,
bool Is64Bit = Subtarget.isPPC64();
bool HasAIXSmallLocalExecTLS = Subtarget.hasAIXSmallLocalExecTLS();
TLSModel::Model Model = getTargetMachine().getTLSModel(GV);
+ // Initialize
https://github.com/orcguru deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84132
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88071
>From 24c3253093491d0fbe297bc10cba8552b7bef665 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:10:37 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Offload][NFC] Remove `omp_` prefix from offloading entries
jhuber6 wrote:
> How about `llvm.offload`? This might need broader discussion but I'm fine
> either way.
I don't think it's too important here since these are effectively internal
variables. However in the future I want to combine `cuda_offload_entires` and
friends into just
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88071
>From 198e77ad14ff83d2ed9ea80a1dcecafa1b1336a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:10:37 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Offload][NFC] Remove `omp_` prefix from offloading entries
zyn0217 wrote:
@jcsxky At the glance of the stacktrace, I suspect we probably need some
mechanism of deferral codegen while instantiating the enclosing struct. Can you
please file a separate issue?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82310
___
https://github.com/CRobeck updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88076
>From 1e2cab61cbf46e5cc73d7ee6523dcce1a75c7549 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corbin Robeck
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:58:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] add clang builtins for amdgcn s_ttrace intrinsics
---
psteinfeld wrote:
Hey, @jhuber. This change broke the flang build.
When I revert the change, everything builds cleanly. So I reverted it in merge
request
After this change was added, I started getting messages like:
```
[4/205] Building CXX object
@@ -688,71 +682,51 @@ class TransferVisitor : public
ConstStmtVisitor {
return;
}
-llvm::DenseMap FieldLocs;
-RecordInitListHelper InitListHelper(S);
+RecordStorageLocation = Env.getResultObjectLocation(*S);
+Env.setValue(*S,
Author: Jefferson Le Quellec
Date: 2024-04-08T14:11:43+01:00
New Revision: 2921a0928c71f4ee652a2478283e47ab5ffebf58
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2921a0928c71f4ee652a2478283e47ab5ffebf58
DIFF:
sdkrystian wrote:
@erichkeane PR updated.
When we encounter a class member access expression with a nested-name-specifier
that is invalid, should we simply ignore it and instead use the type of the
object expression as the lookup context? This is the current behavior, but it
leads to lots
https://github.com/ldrumm closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86807
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87987
This relands #87149.
The previous commit exposed failures on some targets. The reason is only a few
targets support COFF ObjectFormatType on Windows:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Phoebe Wang (phoebewang)
Changes
This relands #87149.
The previous commit exposed failures on some targets. The reason is only a few
targets support COFF ObjectFormatType on Windows:
https://github.com/phoebewang edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87987
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+//===- SemaHLSL.h - Semantic Analysis for HLSL constructs
-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
I really like this direction. Thank you for taking the initiative on cleaning
Sema up!
I had one small comment below, but you can take it or leave it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87912
https://github.com/llvm-beanz edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -345,6 +345,9 @@ Bug Fixes to Compiler Builtins
Bug Fixes to Attribute Support
^^
+- Clang now correctly matches plugin attributes with microsoft ``[attribute]``
syntax.
erichkeane wrote:
> Microsoft attributes use single
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 5d7fd6a04a6748936dece9d90481b2ba4ec97e53
6ba913fb0d3efdb17ae481ccad63ccde2170d4e2 --
https://github.com/frasercrmck created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87989
None
>From b87c2862491aed03f883d6b124a845b0d7c47699 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fraser Cormack
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 16:09:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libclc] Refactor build system to allow in-tree
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
8461d901a770516cf2069fe3bce979a6f8fc8d76...29c9a184c11ed0ba46a8c91b6fbeea828c9fce0d
11happy wrote:
Humble reminder! @PiotrZSL
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+//===- SemaHLSL.h - Semantic Analysis for HLSL constructs
-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-04-08T14:31:46+01:00
New Revision: 0e8736694f752898ed7957a11a11c42f8f6a98d1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e8736694f752898ed7957a11a11c42f8f6a98d1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e8736694f752898ed7957a11a11c42f8f6a98d1.diff
erichkeane wrote:
> @erichkeane PR updated.
>
> When we encounter a class member access expression with a
> nested-name-specifier that is invalid, should we simply ignore it and instead
> use the type of the object expression as the lookup context? This is the
> current behavior, but it
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-04-08T14:31:46+01:00
New Revision: f139387fb6e76a5249e8d7c2d124565e6b566ef4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f139387fb6e76a5249e8d7c2d124565e6b566ef4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f139387fb6e76a5249e8d7c2d124565e6b566ef4.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87320
>From 2d2aa88aab3e47e41588397471a90c03bb55d900 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 08:00:00 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][dataflow] Propagate locations from result
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87361
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87361
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -268,17 +268,34 @@ class alignas(8) Decl {
/// }
/// void A::f(); // SemanticDC == namespace 'A'
///// LexicalDC == global namespace
- llvm::PointerUnion DeclCtx;
+ llvm::PointerIntPair<
erichkeane wrote:
I don't think it ends
@@ -460,25 +460,35 @@ class TransferVisitor : public
ConstStmtVisitor {
// So make sure we have a value if we didn't propagate one above.
if (S->isPRValue() && S->getType()->isRecordType()) {
if (Env.getValue(*S) == nullptr) {
-Value *Val =
@@ -385,6 +388,185 @@ getFieldsGlobalsAndFuncs(const Stmt , FieldSet ,
}
}
+namespace {
+
+// Visitor that builds a map from record prvalues to result objects.
+// This traverses the body of the function to be analyzed; for each result
+// object that it encounters, it
sdkrystian wrote:
> Sorry, I'm not really getting the question here. Obviously that 2nd error is
> invalid and we shouldn't be emitting it, and doing the `::z` lookup inside of
> `A` seems wrong to me. But I'm not sure I get the issue.
We currently emit the second error. I'm asking if we
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
LGTM,
Would be good to run it on llvm or any other code base, and check what it found.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
martinboehme wrote:
I think all comments should be addressed.
@Xazax-hun Should be ready for further review.
@ymand LMK if you have any additional comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87320
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -110,6 +110,12 @@ New checks
Detects error-prone Curiously Recurring Template Pattern usage, when the CRTP
can be constructed outside itself and the derived class.
+- New :doc:`bugprone-null-check-after-dereference
+ ` check.
+
+ This check identifies redundant
@@ -217,34 +231,72 @@ void matchDereferenceExpr(const Stmt *stmt,
Env.assume(Env.arena().makeNot(getVal(kIsNull, *RootValue).formula()));
}
-void matchCastExpr(const CastExpr *cond, const MatchFinder::MatchResult
,
- NullPointerAnalysisModel::TransferArgs
mgorny wrote:
Thanks. This seems to fix that problem. However, now I'm seeing missing dep in
build ordering:
```
[1793/1922] cd /tmp/portage/dev-libs/libclc-19.0.0./work/libclc_build &&
/usr/lib/llvm/17/bin/llvm-spirv --spirv-max-version=1.1 -o spirv-mesa3d-.spv
https://github.com/erichkeane updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87821
>From ca5f957bb002d79997e630cdf1aaad5703ea2ba4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: erichkeane
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:53:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [OpenACC] Implement Sema work for OpenACC Clauses
Now that
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85899
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/llvm-beanz requested changes to this pull request.
I think we need to break this PR up into different parts going to different
places.
Documenting the RootSignature grammar and usage in the Clang docs makes sense.
I think documentation of the RootSignature binary format
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Jan Svoboda (jansvoboda11)
Changes
When writing out a PCM, we compute the set of module maps that did affect the
compilation and we strip the rest to make the output independent of them. The
most common way to read a module map
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
Author: Jan Svoboda (jansvoboda11)
Changes
Clang uses the `HeaderFileInfo` struct to track bits of information on header
files, which gets used throughout the compiler. We also use this to compute the
set of affecting
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87848
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87848
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vgvassilev updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87281
>From 94f1c8653903cc3db55abd641c68a9dd11f05df3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:01:33 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] Revert "Remove extra switch from 0323938d"
This
https://github.com/vgvassilev updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87281
>From 94f1c8653903cc3db55abd641c68a9dd11f05df3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:01:33 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Revert "Remove extra switch from 0323938d"
This
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87876
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87876
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes CHECK
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
rjmccall wrote:
It'll be tested in a follow-up commit which actually adds parsing and Sema
support for these as qualifiers. That should be sufficient rather than adding
a whole unit-test apparatus. Daniil is just trying to avoid landing this in a
single massive commit.
vitalybuka wrote:
I'll land after presubmit checks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -10,12 +10,19 @@
include(ExtendPath)
+# The generated headers will be placed in clang's resource directory if
present.
+if(${OPENMP_STANDALONE_BUILD})
+ set(LIBOMP_HEADERS_INTDIR ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR})
+else()
+ set(LIBOMP_HEADERS_INTDIR
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Joseph Huber (jhuber6)
Changes
Summary:
These headers are a part of the compiler's resource directory once
installed. However, they are currently placed in the binary directory
temporarily. This makes it more difficult to use the compiler
carlosgalvezp wrote:
> the user may not have the ability to change the definition of the macro to be
> able to appease the check
My understanding of this PR is that the user would only need to change what
they pass into the macro, not the macro itself, or? E.g.
```cpp
-MY_MACRO(foo)
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-04-08T09:08:21-07:00
New Revision: 4d6e67f677bdf40360e6aaba171bcdec93990b01
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d6e67f677bdf40360e6aaba171bcdec93990b01
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d6e67f677bdf40360e6aaba171bcdec93990b01.diff
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87848
>From ee56548604be9473f33cd809c901886f37a3d8e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:12:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][modules] Do not resolve `HeaderFileInfo`
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+// UNSUPPORTED: asserts
+// REQUIRES: asserts
+// ^ this attempts to say "don't actually run this test", because it's broken
sethp wrote:
Sounds good, I'll take a look at it when I get a chance.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87799
https://github.com/apache-hb updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86426
>From 245a21512d8658225b17b91b8af4764f54084e01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Elliot <35050275+apache...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:03:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Match against all
https://github.com/benlangmuir approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87849
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88019
This reverts commit e770153865c53c4fd72a68f23acff33c24e42a08.
This wasn't reviewed, and the functionality in question was intentionally
rejected the last time it was discussed in
TIFitis wrote:
@jsjodin @jdoerfert Hi, this patch has been sitting for a while now. Would be
great to get it reviewed and accepted. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80343
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
I hte this behavior, but it is to standard.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88017
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 389 matches
Mail list logo
