https://github.com/arsenm edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89756
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/spavloff updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89617
>From 0fc5c57264ecf51f8b9fe8303520a51cb1fee40e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Pavlov
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:00:14 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] Implementation of '#pragma STDC FENV_ROUND'
This pragma is
OCHyams wrote:
Dependent expressions strike again - https://godbolt.org/z/W381837vr
```
template
using A = int;
template
struct S {
using AA = A;
AA aa;
};
S<0> s;
```
` clang++ -c test.cpp -g -gtemplate-alias`
`clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:15721: bool
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89494
>From 3d5d4d973b9a76d9a07cdd6b89b304e2c7f37308 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 02:52:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Parser] Don't always destroy template annotations at
the
Author: Daniel Grumberg
Date: 2024-04-23T09:00:08+01:00
New Revision: 05c1447b3eabe9cc4a27866094e46c57350c5d5a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/05c1447b3eabe9cc4a27866094e46c57350c5d5a
DIFF:
https://github.com/daniel-grumberg closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89277
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89606
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: NagyDonat
Date: 2024-04-23T10:20:34+02:00
New Revision: ce763bff081f8e97c7c3610ed0f15f14d60e875f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce763bff081f8e97c7c3610ed0f15f14d60e875f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce763bff081f8e97c7c3610ed0f15f14d60e875f.diff
peterwaller-arm wrote:
I have tested building a toolchain using `aarch64-none-elf`, and the problems
described in my comment on
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89234#issuecomment-2069019606 are
resolved. The only change I had to make was to update some references to
cor3ntin wrote:
I should note that while i think this is correct per the standard, no one seems
to be conforming here
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89713
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/sam-mccall created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89729
Prior to this change, modulemaps describing textual headers are considered
to affect the current module whenever HeaderFileInfos for those headers exist.
This wastes creates false dependencies that (among
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Sam McCall (sam-mccall)
Changes
Prior to this change, modulemaps describing textual headers are considered
to affect the current module whenever HeaderFileInfos for those headers exist.
This wastes creates false dependencies that (among
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89497
>From 91915f68902ade86c0bf8eba643428017ae8bb3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 17:58:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [tidy] add new check
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89497
>From 91915f68902ade86c0bf8eba643428017ae8bb3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 17:58:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [tidy] add new check
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89497
>From 91915f68902ade86c0bf8eba643428017ae8bb3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 17:58:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [tidy] add new check
spavloff wrote:
Thanks!
> Is there any existing bookkeeping we no longer need to do if we're going to
> have this RAII object in scope during function parsing?
It seems handling fast-math is the only case that prevented using this RAII
object.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85605
@@ -458,6 +458,40 @@ let TargetGuard = "sme2,sme-f64f64" in {
def SVMLS_LANE_VG1x4_F64 : Inst<"svmls_lane_za64[_{d}]_vg1x4", "vm4di", "d",
MergeNone, "aarch64_sme_fmls_lane_vg1x4", [IsStreaming, IsInOutZA],
[ImmCheck<3, ImmCheck0_1>]>;
}
+let TargetGuard =
https://github.com/dtemirbulatov deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88380
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
11happy wrote:
hello @5chmidti I am sorry for my delayed response quite busy with my academic
work last week, I have added this change
```
if (EndLoc.isInvalid())
return;
```
this works fine for those macros.
Thank you
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84481
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// UNSUPPORTED: system-aix
+
+// RUN: cat %s | clang-repl | FileCheck %s
+int *x = new int();
+template struct GuardX { T * GuardX(T *) : x(x) {}; ~GuardX();
};
+template GuardX::~GuardX() { delete x; x = nullptr; }
+
+// clang would normally defer codegen
katzdm wrote:
> LGTM, thanks! Will you need me to merge the change for you?
@cor3ntin That would be great, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89702
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
edunad wrote:
@nicovank You're right ^^, it's better to just use negative regex, i'll close
this PR then
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89302
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/edunad closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89302
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -target-feature +fullbf16
-S -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+// CHECK-LABEL: define dso_local half
https://github.com/arsenm edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89051
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
LGTM. Would be good to verify the vector case is "correct" in as far as it's
what GCC does
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89051
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -1431,9 +1431,13 @@ Value *ScalarExprEmitter::EmitScalarCast(Value *Src,
QualType SrcType,
return Builder.CreateFPToUI(Src, DstTy, "conv");
}
- if (DstElementTy->getTypeID() < SrcElementTy->getTypeID())
+ if ((DstElementTy->is16bitFPTy() &&
cor3ntin wrote:
> > > This approach is doable technically, but it feels hacky and fragile. What
> > > if we emit an error (or warning) diagnostic and reject the code when we
> > > parse the __is_deducible type trait?
> >
> >
> > Why do you think it is fragile? I think a comment around
https://github.com/weliveindetail updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89734
From 085a93919d8f65419cc856fe5584c83d3eceb142 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Stefan=20Gr=C3=A4nitz?=
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 12:23:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-repl] Add test for explicit
https://github.com/zmodem approved this pull request.
lgtm
Both changes mentioned in the description are old-ish. Maybe expand it to cover
what was the recent change triggering the need for a flag?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89642
___
@@ -656,19 +656,29 @@ std::string ToolChain::getCompilerRT(const ArgList ,
StringRef Component,
// Check for runtime files in the new layout without the architecture first.
std::string CRTBasename =
buildCompilerRTBasename(Args, Component, Type, /*AddArch=*/false);
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// UNSUPPORTED: system-aix
+
+// RUN: cat %s | clang-repl | FileCheck %s
+int *x = new int();
+template struct GuardX { T * GuardX(T *) : x(x) {}; ~GuardX();
};
+template GuardX::~GuardX() { delete x; x = nullptr; }
+
+// clang would normally defer codegen
https://github.com/jasilvanus updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89228
>From 5d4a3b0f922b0c28960f610c695c92da7d3538c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jannik Silvanus
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:56:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Remove YAML hack to emit a BasedOnStyle
@@ -807,12 +807,18 @@ template <> struct MappingTraits {
FormatStyle PredefinedStyle;
if (getPredefinedStyle(StyleName, Style.Language, ) &&
Style == PredefinedStyle) {
- IO.mapOptional("# BasedOnStyle", StyleName);
+ // For
jasilvanus wrote:
I've removed the dummy field and the comment now. This should prevent confusion.
I don't know whether anyone actually uses the emitted comment, there is no
explanation,
and tests pass without it.
I suggest that if we later learn that there are valid uses that require the
weliveindetail wrote:
FYI: The run on the Windows bot failed even though tests worked as expected. In
particular, all `ClangReplInterpreterTests` unittests passed as well as all
`Interpreter` LIT tests. I could land this towards the end of the week.
aheejin wrote:
This first tried to enable four features (reference-types, multivalue,
bulk-memory, and nontrapping-fptoint), but I think now we can enable the two
first: reference-types and multivalue. These two were actually the first
motivation I started this (these are necessary for the
https://github.com/zahiraam approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89687
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@ealcdan Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a
https://github.com/PiotrZSL closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85060
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: ealcdan
Date: 2024-04-23T13:03:09+02:00
New Revision: c52b18d1e41107067b7557d8af3a06e6fe0beb0f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c52b18d1e41107067b7557d8af3a06e6fe0beb0f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c52b18d1e41107067b7557d8af3a06e6fe0beb0f.diff
LOG:
zyn0217 wrote:
> I'm not strongly opposed to merge that, however, i did confirm locally that
> removing the call to `MaybeDestroyTemplateIds` in
> `ParseStatementOrDeclaration` fixes the bug.
>
> We currently destroy annotations
>
> * At the end of a top level decl (and extern decl)
> * At
orcguru wrote:
> It looks like a few of the regression tests are failing on the
> reverse-iteration buildbot
> (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/54/builds/9683)
Thank you! Posted: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89714
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66316
https://github.com/kito-cheng approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89354
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -868,13 +868,7 @@ C++20 implementation status
Class template argument deduction for alias templates
https://wg21.link/p1814r0;>P1814R0
-
-
- Clang 19 (Partial)
- The associated constraints (over.match.class.deduct#3.3) for
@@ -27,3 +26,20 @@ namespace rdar10544564 {
X (Y::*func_mem_ptr1)() = ::memfunc1;
X (Y::*func_mem_ptr2)() = ::memfunc2;
}
+
+namespace test2 {
+ struct A {
+int val;
+void func() {}
+ };
+
+ void test() {
+decltype(&(A::val)) ptr1; // expected-error
@@ -14644,6 +14644,17 @@ QualType Sema::CheckAddressOfOperand(ExprResult
, SourceLocation OpLoc) {
return QualType();
}
+ // C++11 [expr.unary.op] p4:
+ // A pointer to member is only formed when an explicit & is used and
+ //
@@ -14644,6 +14644,17 @@ QualType Sema::CheckAddressOfOperand(ExprResult
, SourceLocation OpLoc) {
return QualType();
}
+ // C++11 [expr.unary.op] p4:
+ // A pointer to member is only formed when an explicit & is used and
+ //
@@ -27,3 +26,20 @@ namespace rdar10544564 {
X (Y::*func_mem_ptr1)() = ::memfunc1;
X (Y::*func_mem_ptr2)() = ::memfunc2;
}
+
+namespace test2 {
cor3ntin wrote:
```suggestion
namespace GH40906 {
```
The test should probably be moved to
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89731
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/89723
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89731.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCoroutine.cpp (+2-4)
-
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89731
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/11happy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84481
>From 8fdf6306085ed4cf0f77b7e718e374e9f65fedf9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 11happy
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 19:02:47 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] add clang-tidy check
readability-math-missing-parentheses
@@ -1149,6 +1149,13 @@ std::string Triple::normalize(StringRef Str) {
}
}
+ // For 3-component triples, the middle component is used to set Vendor;
+ // while if it is "none", we'd prefer to set OS.
+ // This is for some baremetal cases, such as "arm-none-elf".
+ if
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-04-23T16:56:14+08:00
New Revision: b8e3b2ad66cf78ad2b7832577b1d58dc93c5da21
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b8e3b2ad66cf78ad2b7832577b1d58dc93c5da21
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b8e3b2ad66cf78ad2b7832577b1d58dc93c5da21.diff
DavidSpickett wrote:
> Ohh, there is so many -none-unknown- in current code. I guess it may be
> widely used. Do we really want to change all of them?
In current test cases, which were likely generated using clang. So they are
likely not relying on that exact form of the triple, it's just
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
I think this works for the test. I'm slightly confused by the PR not-stacking
with the test changes on top of the other PR
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89687
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/zwuis created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89713
clang don't check whether the operand of the & operator is enclosed in
parantheses when pointer to member is formed in unevaluated context, for
example:
```cpp
struct foo { int val; };
int main() {
hokein wrote:
> > > Regarding the __is_deducible type trait, GCC also provides one, but it
> > > was hidden from users and only used for internal CTAD implementation. I'm
> > > not sure if we should follow the same strategy in clang, ideas?
> >
> >
> > I have mixed feeling. What do you think
@@ -868,13 +868,7 @@ C++20 implementation status
Class template argument deduction for alias templates
https://wg21.link/p1814r0;>P1814R0
-
-
- Clang 19 (Partial)
- The associated constraints (over.match.class.deduct#3.3) for
cor3ntin wrote:
> This approach is doable technically, but it feels hacky and fragile. What if
> we emit an error (or warning) diagnostic and reject the code when we parse
> the __is_deducible type trait?
Why do you think it is fragile? I think a comment around `BTT_IsDeducible`
would take
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89731
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/89723
>From 6d292f1d3bddb5a52ca63babd4bb785266277674 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:48:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang]
https://github.com/fpetrogalli approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89684
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-04-23T17:52:58+08:00
New Revision: b467c6b53660dcaa458c2b5d7fbf5f93ee2af910
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b467c6b53660dcaa458c2b5d7fbf5f93ee2af910
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b467c6b53660dcaa458c2b5d7fbf5f93ee2af910.diff
sam-mccall wrote:
> @sam-mccall That makes sense.
>
> I think one option we have here is to consider all module maps describing a
> textual header that got included as affecting. I'm concerned that a long
> chain of textual header includes might again be problematic.
Yeah, that's the option
ealcdan wrote:
Sure, I just updated my settings, thanks for the suggestion.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85060
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
I'm not strongly opposed to merge that, however, i did confirm locally that
removing the call to `MaybeDestroyTemplateIds` in `ParseStatementOrDeclaration`
fixes the bug.
We currently destroy annotations
- At the end of a top level decl (and extern decl)
- At the end of a
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Stefan Gränitz (weliveindetail)
Changes
This patch adds test coverage for an edge case that is supported already.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89734.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (added)
https://github.com/weliveindetail created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89734
This patch adds test coverage for an edge case that is supported already.
From 085a93919d8f65419cc856fe5584c83d3eceb142 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Stefan=20Gr=C3=A4nitz?=
Date: Tue, 23 Apr
https://github.com/paulwalker-arm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89762
We only use common intrinsics for operations that treat their element type as a
container of bits.
>From ed27a2d1406dccf70e7189578cd6950b61961c1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Walker
Date: Tue, 23
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir
Author: Paul Walker (paulwalker-arm)
Changes
We only use common intrinsics for operations that treat their element type as a
container of bits.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89762.diff
5 Files Affected:
-
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89565
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -9,8 +9,7 @@ using MaxBitInt = _BitInt(128);
constexpr _BitInt(2) A = 0;
constexpr _BitInt(2) B = A + 1;
-constexpr _BitInt(2) C = B + 1; // expected-warning {{from 2 to -2}} \
-// ref-warning {{from 2 to -2}}
+constexpr _BitInt(2) C = B +
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
I don't have a great idea on this one, but losing the diagnostics seems
incorrect. I think the whole initializer should probably be treated in 1 shot
as a constant expr (so move the ConstantExpr to the top (above the
`ImplicitCastExpr` in your
@@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ namespace UndefinedBehavior {
constexpr int n13 = n5 + n5; // expected-error {{constant expression}}
expected-note {{value -4294967296 is outside the range of }}
constexpr int n14 = n3 - n5; // expected-error {{constant expression}}
expected-note
https://github.com/aheejin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80923
>From d6fd48794112d6c140024d7cd55b5fe5e55e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heejin Ahn
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 00:31:59 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [WebAssembly] Add more features to generic CPU config
This
https://github.com/aheejin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -88,10 +88,25 @@ function(link_bc)
${ARGN}
)
+ set( LINK_INPUT_ARG ${ARG_INPUTS} )
+ if( WIN32 OR CYGWIN )
+# Create a response file in case the number of inputs exceeds command-line
+# character limits on certain platforms.
+file( TO_CMAKE_PATH
https://github.com/dtemirbulatov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88380
>From 48659137fa681d2e3fe32490cc8b565f8771ccbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dinar Temirbulatov
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:59:49 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang][AArch64] Extend diagnostics when warning
aheejin wrote:
cc @kripken too (You don't show up in the reviewers list, so I couldn't add you)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -3756,12 +3756,11 @@ def err_sme_definition_using_za_in_non_sme_target :
Error<
def err_sme_definition_using_zt0_in_non_sme2_target : Error<
"function using ZT0 state requires 'sme2'">;
def warn_sme_streaming_pass_return_vl_to_non_streaming : Warning<
- "passing a
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88602
>From 9d0656461683c4a6af76aa3990def06b04eb1b0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:46:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Diagnose apply AST consume actions on LLVM IR
https://github.com/daniel-grumberg updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87772
>From 18912352db31406c7c5b530d6e22f77e775fbf38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Grumberg
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:33:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][ExtractAPI] Fix handling of anonymous
yronglin wrote:
Thanks for your review and confirmation! @AaronBallman @jansvoboda11
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
On reflection, I am still happy enough with this approach. @cor3ntin's
observation that we could remove the call to `MaybeDestroyTemplateIds()` so
that we only destroy at the end of top-level decls and member specifications
would work, but I think there arern was largely
@@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ namespace UndefinedBehavior {
constexpr int n13 = n5 + n5; // expected-error {{constant expression}}
expected-note {{value -4294967296 is outside the range of }}
constexpr int n14 = n3 - n5; // expected-error {{constant expression}}
expected-note
https://github.com/aheejin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80923
>From d6fd48794112d6c140024d7cd55b5fe5e55e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heejin Ahn
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 00:31:59 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [WebAssembly] Add more features to generic CPU config
This
cor3ntin wrote:
Talking with @AaronBallman I think I'm happy with that. If we ever find further
corner cases, we might want to reconsider.
Thanks for the patch!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
zyn0217 wrote:
Thank you @AaronBallman again for providing performance data from trackers. (I
think it's also time for me to learn how to use the tracker, by the way :-)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
401 - 489 of 489 matches
Mail list logo
