https://github.com/cristianassaiante edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NagyDonat wrote:
Personally I feel that option 2 ("add more error handling to avoid crashes in
`checkGetdelim`") would be more "natural" for the static analyzer, because
checking the exact types of the parameters is rare in the analyzer (I don't
know any significant example apart from `StdLibr
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145280
This was broken before because we ended up using a constructor that was
disabled via assert(false). Use ShiftAP() if either LHS or RHS is allocated.
>From 58751e9c9b5d9c2437c6a3a6f22b16c5aba8b8ab Mon Sep 17 00
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// REQUIRES: x86-registered-target
+
+// Make sure opt-bisect works through both pass managers
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O1 %s -mllvm
-opt-disable="inlinerpass,SROAPass,machine code sinking" -mllvm
-opt-disable-verbose -emit-obj -o /dev/
https://github.com/s-perron created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145327
We add the options to the driver, so that the one option that is being
implemented at this time can be used. Issue an error for the other
options.
When we start to implement the other options, we will have to f
flovent wrote:
ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144213
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vbvictor wrote:
> Your concern that "However, we will still try to model "incorrect" getline
> methods, wasting cpu." is very premature optimization, the runtime change
> would be totally negligible
Indeed, without measurements, this argument is not viable.
I've investigated the code of `StdL
balazs-benics-sonarsource wrote:
I was thinking about possible ways to unblock this change.
If the additional code complexity needs justification, by measuring the average
impact (to ensure no regression happens in the common cases), and by repeating
the measurement of the handful of edge-case
Author: Baranov Victor
Date: 2025-06-23T16:27:18+03:00
New Revision: 05491e0359edcac9954a29f2a1579241522669ca
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/05491e0359edcac9954a29f2a1579241522669ca
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/05491e0359edcac9954a29f2a1579241522669ca.diff
https://github.com/vbvictor closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143554
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Steven Perron (s-perron)
Changes
We add the options to the driver, so that the one option that is being
implemented at this time can be used. Issue an error for the other
options.
When we start to implement
vbvictor wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141304
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android` running on `sanitizer-buildbot-android` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/10118
Here is the relev
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - bugprone-null-check-after-dereference
+
+bugprone-null-check-after-dereference
+=
+
+.. note::
+
+ This check uses a flow-sensitive static analysis to produce its
+ results. Therefore, it may be mor
Author: Steven Perron
Date: 2025-06-23T09:36:12-04:00
New Revision: cccb82e5529136465ad3d073db7df4fe89a335c0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cccb82e5529136465ad3d073db7df4fe89a335c0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cccb82e5529136465ad3d073db7df4fe89a335c0.diff
https://github.com/s-perron closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144934
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vbvictor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143550
>From 897ef525a85345811ed8d3bc4da8d2886d05dfe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Baranov
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:12:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] add 'IgnoreMarcos' option to
'special-member
NagyDonat wrote:
> I was thinking about possible ways to unblock this change.
>
> If the additional code complexity needs justification, by measuring the
> average impact (to ensure no regression happens in the common cases), and by
> repeating the measurement of the handful of edge-cases wher
@@ -103,6 +103,12 @@ New checks
Finds lambda captures that capture the ``this`` pointer and store it as class
members without handle the copy and move constructors and the assignments.
+- New :doc:`bugprone-null-check-after-dereference
+ ` check.
+
+ Identifies redundant
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - bugprone-null-check-after-dereference
+
+bugprone-null-check-after-dereference
+=
+
+.. note::
+
+ This check uses a flow-sensitive static analysis to produce its
+ results. Therefore, it may be mor
steakhal wrote:
Modeling a function should only happen if that's the intended function.
Sometimes this matching is deliberately fuzzy, but most often it's incidentally
so and they should have really check the parameter and return types for exact
match. Or at least the parameters that the model
https://github.com/denzor200 requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99917
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,437 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++14 %s bugprone-incorrect-iterators %t
+
+namespace std {
+
+template struct pair {};
+
+namespace execution {
+
+class parallel_policy {};
+
+constexpr parallel_policy par;
+
+} // namespace execution
+
+template class reverse
https://github.com/tclin914 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145267
Andes AX45MPV is 64-bit in-order dual-issue 8-stage pipeline linux-capable CPU
implementing the RV64IMAFDCV ISA extension. That is developed by Andes
Technology https://www.andestech.com, a RISC-V IP provider.
@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
+namespace {
+AST_MATCHER(CXXRecordDecl, isInMacro) {
vbvictor wrote:
Yes, I was thinking lately about it.
I've seen some matchers use only `Node.getBeginLoc()
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145280
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+//===--- BoolBitwiseOperationCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/hassnaaHamdi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Jim Lin (tclin914)
Changes
Andes AX45MPV is 64-bit in-order dual-issue 8-stage pipeline linux-capable CPU
implementing the RV64IMAFDCV ISA extension. That is developed by Andes
Technology https://www.andestech.com, a RISC-V IP pr
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+//===--- BoolBitwiseOperationCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/jurahul closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145187
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Rahul Joshi
Date: 2025-06-23T07:09:48-07:00
New Revision: 6d17eb5126b352c7929e2cfcd2440c3bd70ec907
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6d17eb5126b352c7929e2cfcd2440c3bd70ec907
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6d17eb5126b352c7929e2cfcd2440c3bd70ec907.diff
L
@@ -676,35 +676,23 @@ Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitHLSLBuiltinExpr(unsigned
BuiltinID,
case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_wave_active_sum: {
// Due to the use of variadic arguments, explicitly retreive argument
Value *OpExpr = EmitScalarExpr(E->getArg(0));
-llvm::Func
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145334
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu
Date: 2025-06-23T11:02:06-04:00
New Revision: 44936c8d13f904a68647d83bdcdbbeefb4670d3e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/44936c8d13f904a68647d83bdcdbbeefb4670d3e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/44936c8d13f904a68647d83bdcdbbeefb4670d3e.dif
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145339
We need to take signeness into account here.
>From fade41f6df27da0c20751276aa8586bb1540bbf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 17:10:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [
https://github.com/yxsamliu closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140106
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -683,6 +683,206 @@ Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitAMDGPUBuiltinExpr(unsigned
BuiltinID,
return Builder.CreateInsertElement(I0, A, 1);
}
+ case AMDGPU::BI__builtin_amdgcn_image_load_1d_v4f32_i32:
+ case AMDGPU::BI__builtin_amdgcn_image_load_1darray_v4f32_i32:
+ case A
stellar-aria wrote:
I'm assuming the MSAN failure is a result of the ASAN failure, since I don't
see any reference to UseNumericLimitsCheck in that output.
The ASAN output however...
```/home/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/UseNumericLim
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
We need to take signeness into account here.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145339.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/IntegralAP.h (+10-2)
- (modified) cl
Steelskin wrote:
> Just to confirm, does this make clang-cl line up with cl's behavior?
As @compnerd said, this is clang-cl specific. None of these options exist in
`cl.exe`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144805
___
cfe-commits mailing li
https://github.com/Steelskin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144805
>From 6c9e0438677d60d5dfb23ca821ed04e27bdac8c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabrice de Gans
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:04:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Use the Windows SDK arguments over the environment
If any o
vbvictor wrote:
One of the logs also suggests `UseNumericLimitsCheck.cpp:81:31`.
As of LLVM policy, we need to revert it. @stellar-aria, I will create a revert
patch in a couple of hours or accept yours if you do it first.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127430
___
kparzysz wrote:
@alexey-bataev, could you clarify what tests you had in mind?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141772
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
delcypher wrote:
@anthonyhatran Here's an example for `SanitizerHandler::InvalidObjCCast`
```
// Build with -fsanitize=objc-cast -fsanitize-trap=objc-cast
@interface NSFastEnumerationState
@end
#define NSUInteger unsigned int
@interface NSArray
+(NSArray*) arrayWithObjects: (id) first, ...;
-
Author: Nikita Popov
Date: 2025-06-23T17:37:33+02:00
New Revision: 1128a4fd2c3a70ba61eead2ce093a9c31aa2970e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1128a4fd2c3a70ba61eead2ce093a9c31aa2970e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1128a4fd2c3a70ba61eead2ce093a9c31aa2970e.diff
https://github.com/nikic closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145334
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
TiborGY wrote:
> I feel like this is a solution that can grow out of hand very easily. IMO the
> better solution would be to have `-Wmissing-noreturn` place a `[[noreturn]]`
> into the AST to avoid incorrect follow-up diagnostics.
I agree, in principle I would expect Clang to be able to prove
stellar-aria wrote:
`UseNumericLimitsCheck.cpp:81:31` is just the call site for that matcher, so
that's why it's in the backtrace, I think. I'll leave the revert patch to you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127430
___
cfe-commits mailing l
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145341
P.block() will assert that P is a block pointer, which it doesn't have to be
here.
>From 598d2a9d4c5e31749e79c35802d4b3b3ca8773be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Mon, 23 Jun
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
P.block() will assert that P is a block pointer, which it doesn't have to be
here.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145341.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCod
AaronBallman wrote:
Precommit CI found a relevant failure on Windows (it looks like we're crashing,
IIRC that's `STATUS_HEAP_CORRUPTION` as a failure code):
```
FAIL: Clang :: Index/inline-assembly.c (13090 of 21590)
TEST 'Clang :: Index/inline-assembly.c' FAILED
*
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kerry McLaughlin (kmclaughlin-arm)
Changes
Adds FP8 variants for existing VST1, VST2, VST3 & VST4 intrinsics.
---
Patch is 36.17 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/
https://github.com/andrurogerz created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145374
## Purpose
This patch is one in a series of code-mods that annotate LLVM’s public
interface for export. This patch ensures a few `cl::opt` declarations are
properly annotated with `LLVM_ABI`. The annotation
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcpu=andes-ax45mpv --print-enabled-extensions
| FileCheck %s
mshockwave wrote:
I believe this is also what AArch64 does
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145267
_
https://github.com/mshockwave approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ojhunt wrote:
@vbvictor super sorry, I'm feeling quite sick so can't really read the PR
today, will probably not get to it until tomorrow
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144270
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
JDevlieghere wrote:
This breaks the std module import feature in LLDB:
https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/28186/.
Also reproduces in pre-commit CI:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/15830795745/job/44622706379?pr=145366
We're hitting the follow
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144261
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144262
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/inbelic updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144769
>From 3761e5204d2d435cc09f392fd2e53c2125fac0ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Finn Plummer
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:46:10 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [HLSL][RootSignature] Plug-in serialization and add full
samp
Miguel =?utf-8?q?Cárdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?Cárdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?Cárdenas?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute
to the repo. Please turn off [Keep my email addresses
private](https://g
vbvictor wrote:
Reverted, thank you [qinkunbao](https://github.com/qinkunbao) for the report!
When making a new PR for this check, please make the title `Reland
"[clang-tidy] Add ..."` provide a description of what broke and how it was
fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127430
__
https://github.com/benlangmuir approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bcardosolopes edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144726
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144877
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Miguel =?utf-8?q?Cárdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?Cárdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?Cárdenas?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@miguelcsx Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from
Author: Miguel Cárdenas
Date: 2025-06-23T13:15:04-05:00
New Revision: e80acd4fae600ff9ead1d3210a30ce6ad07a7dd9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e80acd4fae600ff9ead1d3210a30ce6ad07a7dd9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e80acd4fae600ff9ead1d3210a30ce6ad07a7dd9.dif
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// This verifies that hotpatch function attributes are correctly propagated
when compiling directly to OBJ,
+// and that name mangling works as expected.
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cl -c --target=x86_64-windows-msvc -O2 /Z7
-fms-secure-hotpatch-functions-list=?this_ge
Miguel =?utf-8?q?Cárdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?Cárdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?Cárdenas?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145365
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM after the REQUIRES issue is addressed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138972
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
ahatanak wrote:
Note that the range exceeds the underlying type's size in this case because `1
<< i` is treated as logically positive (see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126846#issuecomment-2936836277).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145356
___
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
Awesome!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144950
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vbvictor wrote:
No problem, take your time! Feel better soon.
Regarding this comment:
> should probably be earlier - this is inside an array of object
My logic is still placed inside that `if (object || pointer)`, should I try to
look for an earlier place in `resolveAllocationOverloadInterior`
yronglin wrote:
Many thanks for your review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143898
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/alexey-bataev commented:
Do you have the printing test for all updated directives?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141772
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
https://github.com/jakeegan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129925
>From 072f4eca3825729d69d423d774c8a3298cb624a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jake Egan
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 01:57:38 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [clang] Implement address sanitizer on AIX (1/3)
The PR inclu
Author: Henrik G. Olsson
Date: 2025-06-23T10:16:31-07:00
New Revision: 319a51a5ffb807b88ae7f73676894bf306a0d134
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/319a51a5ffb807b88ae7f73676894bf306a0d134
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/319a51a5ffb807b88ae7f73676894bf306a0d134.di
@@ -4041,7 +4133,8 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitUnreachable(SourceLocation Loc)
{
void CodeGenFunction::EmitTrapCheck(llvm::Value *Checked,
SanitizerHandler CheckHandlerID,
-bool NoMerge) {
+
5chmidti wrote:
> > Actually, the cxxRecordDecl might not be in a macro, but the special member
> > functions are.
>
> The checker doc states:
> `The check finds classes where some but not all of the special member
> functions are defined.`
> I think we only need to ignore if the whole class e
Miguel =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A1rdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A1rdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A1rdenas?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/jhuber6 approved this pull request.
Yeah, usually easier to do a force push if you plan on doing a rebase.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
Miguel =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A1rdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A1rdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A1rdenas?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145365
___
cfe-commits
Miguel =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A1rdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A1rdenas?= ,
Miguel =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A1rdenas?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
josemonsalve2 wrote:
This one replaces #145200 which was closed due to some confusion.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145365
_
https://github.com/jakeegan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129925
>From 072f4eca3825729d69d423d774c8a3298cb624a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jake Egan
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 01:57:38 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] [clang] Implement address sanitizer on AIX (1/3)
The PR inclu
@@ -82,6 +83,44 @@ class LLVM_ABI OptBisect : public OptPassGate {
int LastBisectNum = 0;
};
+/// This class implements a mechanism to disable passes and individual
+/// optimizations at compile time based on a command line option
+/// (-opt-disable) in order to study how si
@@ -51,10 +51,59 @@ bool OptBisect::shouldRunPass(const StringRef PassName,
int CurBisectNum = ++LastBisectNum;
bool ShouldRun = (BisectLimit == -1 || CurBisectNum <= BisectLimit);
if (OptBisectVerbose)
-printPassMessage(PassName, CurBisectNum, IRDescription, ShouldRu
@@ -51,10 +51,59 @@ bool OptBisect::shouldRunPass(const StringRef PassName,
int CurBisectNum = ++LastBisectNum;
bool ShouldRun = (BisectLimit == -1 || CurBisectNum <= BisectLimit);
if (OptBisectVerbose)
-printPassMessage(PassName, CurBisectNum, IRDescription, ShouldRu
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// REQUIRES: x86-registered-target
mtrofin wrote:
should the test be in llvm/test? it's not tied to clang
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@list
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-06-23T19:11:01+02:00
New Revision: c445ca5412a7ee1bf7a598e860b50f29602e1981
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c445ca5412a7ee1bf7a598e860b50f29602e1981
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c445ca5412a7ee1bf7a598e860b50f29602e1981.diff
L
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// REQUIRES: x86-registered-target
+
+// Make sure opt-bisect works through both pass managers
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O1 %s -mllvm
-opt-disable="inlinerpass,SROAPass,machine code sinking" -mllvm
-opt-disable-verbose -emit-obj -o /dev/
@@ -1635,8 +1656,13 @@ bool tools::addSanitizerRuntimes(const ToolChain &TC,
const ArgList &Args,
}
// If there is a static runtime with no dynamic list, force all the symbols
// to be dynamic to be sure we export sanitizer interface functions.
- if (AddExportDynamic)
-
https://github.com/qiongsiwu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144105
>From 2187de3d30045a02c03ca009f2497608ab6bc6a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiongsi Wu
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:05:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Enhancing DependencyScanningFilesystemSharedCache's API
that
https://github.com/anchuraj updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143441
>From c9b65080c1301c46b05fddc1278eaf2817963cb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anchu Rajendran
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 15:12:49 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [flang][flang-driver] atomic control support
---
clang/i
https://github.com/RolandF77 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145372
Add support for PPC Dense Math basic builtins dmsetdmrz, dmmr, dmxor.
>From fc5226fa4bb20267c4e3ed3c687056461ccfbccb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roland Froese
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 17:27:46 +
Subject:
sivadeilra wrote:
@rnk - Aside from the comments / text edits, do you have any other suggestions
for this PR?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144745
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm
https://github.com/yronglin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145362
Fixs: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/145250.
>From 967ba04e0a0f11edbaf36ce6edb51f6ab4fcb56b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:51:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [C23][Pa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (yronglin)
Changes
Fixs: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/145250.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145362.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+2)
- (modified) clang/
yronglin wrote:
Many thanks for your review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145244
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Baranov Victor
Date: 2025-06-23T19:39:01+03:00
New Revision: c594f6e697435fbb2458104c51e1bbbfd9df6689
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c594f6e697435fbb2458104c51e1bbbfd9df6689
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c594f6e697435fbb2458104c51e1bbbfd9df6689.diff
101 - 200 of 379 matches
Mail list logo
