llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Nicolas van Kempen (nicovank)
Changes
[There is
work](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-upgrading-llvms-minimum-required-python-version/67571)
to make Python 3.8 the minimum Python version for LLVM.
I edited this script
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Nicolas van Kempen (nicovank)
Changes
[There is
work](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-upgrading-llvms-minimum-required-python-version/67571)
to make Python 3.8 the minimum Python version for LLVM.
I edited this script because I
https://github.com/nicovank created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89490
[There is
work](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-upgrading-llvms-minimum-required-python-version/67571)
to make Python 3.8 the minimum Python version for LLVM.
I edited this script because I wanted some
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Changes to DR tests look good to me, thank you!
Can you send an email to Jens Maurer asking him to mark 2526 as superseded by
2749?
I'm also somewhat suspicious of the fact that we check only LHS for being
`void*`, but that's what we did previously as
Troy-Butler wrote:
I'm not sure of how it happened, but despite fetching the latest version of
files, my clone/fork didn't fully update before I made this pull request, and
it's causing issues that I'm not experienced enough to resolve. To be safe, I'm
going to close this pull request, erase
https://github.com/Troy-Butler closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89294
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Troy-Butler wrote:
I apologize - I'm not sure how this happened. I was careful to refresh my
fork/clone before starting on this issue, but somehow not all of the files were
updated, and now my PR requests are getting wires crossed. I think it would be
safest for me to close this issue, delete
https://github.com/Troy-Butler closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89480
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vikramRH wrote:
Gentle ping :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89217
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-04-20T06:13:32+02:00
New Revision: 22bf7c5e01e8693b2da722e1a33e69e931d6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/22bf7c5e01e8693b2da722e1a33e69e931d6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/22bf7c5e01e8693b2da722e1a33e69e931d6.diff
aniplcc wrote:
cc @RKSimon
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89202
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere requested changes to this pull request.
+1 on what Cyndy said. The lldb change itself looks fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89480
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
phoebewang wrote:
Sorry, I know nothing about it. But it looks to me it's to match with GCC, why
don't borrow the value from GCC as a beginning?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89446
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
cyndyishida wrote:
It appears your PR branch is based on a stale version of the target `llvm/main`
branch, resulting in more commits than what this PR intended for. Please merge
in the target branch and resolve any conflicts.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89480
https://github.com/owenca closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-04-19T20:21:43-07:00
New Revision: c455b462da70e800124ca4f453c466ea05db6033
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c455b462da70e800124ca4f453c466ea05db6033
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c455b462da70e800124ca4f453c466ea05db6033.diff
https://github.com/cyndyishida closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Cyndy Ishida
Date: 2024-04-19T19:57:39-07:00
New Revision: f03cd2db91956456f1c5e2da86d3c50183eebd28
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f03cd2db91956456f1c5e2da86d3c50183eebd28
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f03cd2db91956456f1c5e2da86d3c50183eebd28.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (offsetof)
Changes
[[expr.const]/5.14](https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.const#5.14) says that
constexpr cast from code*cv* void\*/code to `T*` is OK if the
pointee type is similar to `T`, but Clang currently only permits the conversion
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
https://github.com/offsetof created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89484
[[expr.const]/5.14](https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.const#5.14) says that
constexpr cast from *cv* void\* to `T*` is OK if the pointee type
is similar to `T`, but Clang currently only permits the conversion if
https://github.com/dtellenbach approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Cyndy Ishida (cyndyishida)
Changes
Matches up with the clang setting
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89483.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/cmake/caches/Apple-stage2.cmake (+1)
``diff
diff
https://github.com/cyndyishida edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cyndyishida created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89483
Matches up with the clang tools
>From 76ece379c8a8325b0f866a89e1de523cbeaa0c25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:34:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][darwin][cmake]
https://github.com/danix800 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89096
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ding Fei
Date: 2024-04-20T10:11:02+08:00
New Revision: 0ccdd4c28fca72d1e1d518c6ed9715e92fb47edf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ccdd4c28fca72d1e1d518c6ed9715e92fb47edf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ccdd4c28fca72d1e1d518c6ed9715e92fb47edf.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Troy Butler (Troy-Butler)
Changes
Addresses issue #85984
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89480.diff
6 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Store.h
(+2-2)
-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Troy Butler (Troy-Butler)
Changes
Addresses issue #85984
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89480.diff
6 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Store.h
(+2-2)
-
https://github.com/Troy-Butler created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89480
Addresses issue #85984
>From fba4b0556340a00c1e059a8abdba5fdd1b0e38ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Troy-Butler
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:28:45 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [LLVM][LIB] Refactor Redundant
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 5b4ed0dc9fac9144efe74da77517dcff46e731e9
cd8df1939a456c05a1d94c471627fc5a7a332fc1 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
This is an attempt to better align the denormal handling of
-ffp-model=fast with the behavior of -ffast-math. The clang user's
manual claims that -ffp-model=fast "behaves identically to specifying
both
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
This is an attempt to better align the denormal handling of
-ffp-model=fast with the behavior of -ffast-math. The clang user's
manual claims that -ffp-model=fast "behaves identically to specifying
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89477
This is an attempt to better align the denormal handling of
-ffp-model=fast with the behavior of -ffast-math. The clang user's
manual claims that -ffp-model=fast "behaves identically to specifying
both
delcypher wrote:
The implementation of the experimental late attribute changed (#88596) so I've
rebased this PR on it and fixed it up to work as intended.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
delcypher wrote:
@rapidsna I've re-implemented this patch with the new semantics that we
discussed offline. I have also reworked #87596 to use this new implementation.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88596
>From b859cf056df24daa85f3fd305ef56f32e0f266ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:36:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Attributes] Support Attributes being declared as supporting
an
https://github.com/delcypher edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/delcypher edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88596
>From ec02422a6e2f3460c5606a52a04ba8f5b89b802f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:36:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Attributes] Support Attributes being declared as supporting
an
https://github.com/delcypher edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/delcypher edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88596
>From 24ea6b9306e0da81b956718590bff3c3cfb9124c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:36:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Attributes] Support Attributes being declared as supporting
an
https://github.com/delcypher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87596
>From 24ea6b9306e0da81b956718590bff3c3cfb9124c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Liew
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:36:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Attributes] Support Attributes being declared as
supporting
joker-eph wrote:
This seems to have broken the bot:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89476 (you should have had an email?)
I reverted in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89476
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89378
___
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mehdi Amini (joker-eph)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#89378
Broke the windows premerge checks
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/271/builds/6788
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89476.diff
4 Files
https://github.com/joker-eph closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89476
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Mehdi Amini
Date: 2024-04-20T02:34:50+02:00
New Revision: b48ea2d394911efcc56880fde58f806282db1e8a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b48ea2d394911efcc56880fde58f806282db1e8a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b48ea2d394911efcc56880fde58f806282db1e8a.diff
https://github.com/joker-eph created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89476
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#89378
Broke the windows premerge checks
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/271/builds/6788
>From 7897826aa7931ffc854a88b20e5ab8bf976ad093 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mehdi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: None (ille-apple)
Changes
This is an updated version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D90434 from 2020. Due
to time constraints I stopped working on the patch, and unfortunately never got
back around to it until now.
Clang
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (ille-apple)
Changes
This is an updated version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D90434 from 2020. Due
to time constraints I stopped working on the patch, and unfortunately never got
back around to it until now.
Clang special-cases
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
https://github.com/ille-apple created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89475
This is an updated version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D90434 from 2020. Due
to time constraints I stopped working on the patch, and unfortunately never got
back around to it until now.
Clang special-cases
https://github.com/wzssyqa edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -28,6 +28,19 @@ if (CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR STREQUAL CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR)
if (NOT LLVM_RUNTIMES_BUILD)
load_llvm_config()
endif()
+ if(LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR AND NOT APPLE)
+set(print_target_triple ${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER}
@@ -28,6 +28,19 @@ if (CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR STREQUAL CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR)
if (NOT LLVM_RUNTIMES_BUILD)
load_llvm_config()
endif()
+ if(LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR AND NOT APPLE)
wzssyqa wrote:
With my patch, `libclang_rt.builtin` has been
@@ -181,6 +181,20 @@ message(STATUS "LLVM default target triple:
${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}")
set(LLVM_TARGET_TRIPLE "${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}")
+if(LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR AND NOT APPLE)
+ set(print_target_triple ${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER}
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ if(WIN32 OR LLVM_WINSYSROOT)
set(RUNTIMES_${target}_CMAKE_MODULE_LINKER_FLAGS ${WINDOWS_LINK_FLAGS} CACHE
STRING "")
endif()
-foreach(target
https://github.com/wzssyqa requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wzssyqa edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
wzssyqa wrote:
Does it really needed?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Congcong Cai
Date: 2024-04-20T07:45:20+08:00
New Revision: 7fcca112034f55c26e943c13fd0d57adfbe96705
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7fcca112034f55c26e943c13fd0d57adfbe96705
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7fcca112034f55c26e943c13fd0d57adfbe96705.diff
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor)
Changes
This changes the handling of -fno-unsafe-fp-math to stop having that
option imply -ftrapping-math. In gcc, -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations sets
-ftrapping-math, but that dependency is based on the
https://github.com/andykaylor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89473
This changes the handling of -fno-unsafe-fp-math to stop having that
option imply -ftrapping-math. In gcc, -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations sets
-ftrapping-math, but that dependency is based on the fact the
@@ -930,12 +931,12 @@ CodeGenFunction::emitFlexibleArrayMemberSize(const Expr
*E, unsigned Type,
// Get the flexible array member Decl.
const RecordDecl *OuterRD = nullptr;
- std::string FAMName;
+ const FieldDecl *FAMDecl = nullptr;
if (const auto *ME =
https://github.com/bwendling updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89462
>From 2a6b3356a977132459bed84fb4e4add631e181cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Wendling
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:06:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][NFC] Improve testing for the flexible array
bwendling wrote:
A quick look at `Decl` seems like it would require adding a
`PrevInContextAndBits`, which would increase the size by `sizeof(Decl *)`. I
might be able to massage a way to make it work, but it's probably not worth it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89462
@@ -930,12 +931,12 @@ CodeGenFunction::emitFlexibleArrayMemberSize(const Expr
*E, unsigned Type,
// Get the flexible array member Decl.
const RecordDecl *OuterRD = nullptr;
- std::string FAMName;
+ const FieldDecl *FAMDecl = nullptr;
if (const auto *ME =
efriedma-quic wrote:
If you can pull it off without increasing the size of Decl, sure; not sure it's
worthwhile otherwise.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
bwendling wrote:
Would changing the `decl_iterator` into a bidirectional iterator be acceptable?
That way I could grab the last `FieldDecl` to check if it's a FAM rather than
iterating through unnecessary `Decls`...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89462
https://github.com/bwendling edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bwendling wrote:
> Strictly speaking, I don't think this is NFC. Consider, for example:
>
> ```
> struct S {
> struct X { int array[1]; } x;
> struct Y { int count; int array[] __attribute__((__counted_by__(count))); }
> y;
> };
> void f(void* __attribute__((pass_dynamic_object_size(0;
efriedma-quic wrote:
Strictly speaking, I don't think this is NFC. Consider, for example:
```
struct S {
struct X { int array[1]; } x;
struct Y { int count; int array[] __attribute__((__counted_by__(count))); } y;
};
void f(void* __attribute__((pass_dynamic_object_size(0;
void g(struct
ian-twilightcoder wrote:
> > Is this a pre-existing issue, or did my patch change to make "each textual
> > header gets a `HFI`"?
>
> My best understanding that your patch gave textual headers`HFI`s when the
> module map was loaded, rather than when the header was included. This
> shouldn't
sam-mccall wrote:
> Is this a pre-existing issue, or did my patch change to make "each textual
> header gets a `HFI`"?
My best understanding that your patch gave textual headers`HFI`s when the
module map was loaded, rather than when the header was included. This shouldn't
have mattered, but
bwendling wrote:
> Does this still work for cases where there are multiple flexible arrays? e.g.
>
> ```
> struct weird_protocol {
> unsigned int cmd_type;
> unsigned int data_len;
> union {
> struct cmd_one one[];
> struct cmd_two two[];
> struct cmd_three
https://github.com/offsetof edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kees wrote:
Does this still work for cases where there are multiple flexible arrays? e.g.
```
struct weird_protocol {
unsigned int cmd_type;
unsigned int data_len;
union {
struct cmd_one one[];
struct cmd_two two[];
struct cmd_three three[];
unsigned
sam-mccall wrote:
> clang's headers all have proper modules now, are you sure you still need A?
We can't use `clang/lib/Headers/module.modulemap`, so we need something to
describe those headers.
Why can't we? In our build system, it's the **build system's** job to generate
modulemaps for
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Bill Wendling (bwendling)
Changes
Testing for the name of the flexible array member isn't as robust as testing
the FieldDecl pointers.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89462.diff
https://github.com/bwendling created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89462
Testing for the name of the flexible array member isn't as robust as testing
the FieldDecl pointers.
>From 2a6b3356a977132459bed84fb4e4add631e181cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Wendling
Date: Fri, 19
jansvoboda11 wrote:
> Is this a pre-existing issue, or did my patch change to make "each textual
> header gets a `HFI`"?
I'm not sure yet, I think we'll need to investigate [Sam's
reproducer](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89005#issuecomment-2067300965)
and consider [Richard's
@@ -826,29 +826,32 @@ const FieldDecl
*CodeGenFunction::FindFlexibleArrayMemberField(
ASTContext , const RecordDecl *RD, StringRef Name, uint64_t ) {
const LangOptions::StrictFlexArraysLevelKind StrictFlexArraysLevel =
getLangOpts().getStrictFlexArraysLevel();
-
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ian-twilightcoder wrote:
> I updated the description of this PR, hopefully it makes more sense now. I
> still need to investigate what goes wrong in
> "Modules/preprocess-decluse.cpp". It seems that it assumes `%t/b.pcm` embeds
> the information from "a.modulemap".
Is this a pre-existing
https://github.com/Sirraide updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89420
>From a64b08503ae9f49d8b58ee92c226ba19c450ca27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sirraide
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:13:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Fix crash on invalid size in static_assert
message
---
Sirraide wrote:
Actually, a trailing comma in the macro invocation might work too. It’s been a
while since I last had to deal w/ this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84520
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Erich Keane (erichkeane)
Changes
num_gangs takes an 'int-expr-list', for 'parallel', and an 'int-expr' for
'kernels'. This patch changes the parsing to always parse it as an
'int-expr-list', then correct the expression count during
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Erich Keane (erichkeane)
Changes
num_gangs takes an 'int-expr-list', for 'parallel', and an 'int-expr' for
'kernels'. This patch changes the parsing to always parse it as an
'int-expr-list', then correct the expression count
https://github.com/erichkeane created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89460
num_gangs takes an 'int-expr-list', for 'parallel', and an 'int-expr' for
'kernels'. This patch changes the parsing to always parse it as an
'int-expr-list', then correct the expression count during Sema.
jansvoboda11 wrote:
I updated the description of this PR, hopefully it makes more sense now. I
still need to investigate what goes wrong in "Modules/preprocess-decluse.cpp".
It seems that it assumes `%t/b.pcm` embeds the information from "a.modulemap".
Sirraide wrote:
> @Sirraide, I noticed the following build issue when new compiler with this
> change (bootstrap compiler) is being used to build one of the files for
> `clangd`:
>
> ```
> .../clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/FindTargetTests.cpp:430:29: error:
> passing no argument for the
@@ -826,29 +826,32 @@ const FieldDecl
*CodeGenFunction::FindFlexibleArrayMemberField(
ASTContext , const RecordDecl *RD, StringRef Name, uint64_t ) {
const LangOptions::StrictFlexArraysLevelKind StrictFlexArraysLevel =
getLangOpts().getStrictFlexArraysLevel();
-
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bwendling closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Bill Wendling
Date: 2024-04-19T21:38:17Z
New Revision: 5bcf31ebfad8b32aed20dd47be6238cc19710e63
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5bcf31ebfad8b32aed20dd47be6238cc19710e63
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5bcf31ebfad8b32aed20dd47be6238cc19710e63.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// Check that a clang invocation can spawn and handshake with a module build
daemon
+
+// RUN: %kill-process "-cc1modbuildd mbd-handshake"
+// RUN: rm -rf mbd-handshake %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+
+//--- main.c
+int main() {return 0;}
+
+// RUN: %clang
sam-mccall wrote:
Thanks for the pointer to 87848 - reverting that one locally doesn't help
though, even in combination with applying #89005 and #89428. So this change
isn't on the critical path to fixing our builds, but still much appreciated and
will take a look now.
---
Unsurprisingly,
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89171
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 372 matches
Mail list logo
