https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91435
This patch adds examples from
[[dcl.init.aggr]](http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.init.aggr) to C++ conformance
tests. Testing is done via constant evaluation and static asserts. As far as I
can see, the rest of the
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91435
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c -verify %s
+
Endilll wrote:
Any reference would become outdated the moment this file is touched next time,
so I added one to the PR description, so it makes it into the commit message.
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92113
This patch covers the following Core issues:
[CWG930](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/930.html) "`alignof` with
incomplete array type"
[CWG1110](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1110.html)
Endilll wrote:
@ZequanWu thank you for your help, but next time you should disable renaming
passes as specified in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807#issuecomment-2102760018.
C-Reduce output can be typically reduced further manually, but it's a pain
without names.
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92113
>From 1ae4b4e9c6b76269b7e279f798057900b5d39a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 15:45:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Add tests for CWG issues regarding completeness
@@ -67,6 +63,27 @@ void B::g() requires true;
} // namespace cwg2847
+namespace cwg2857 { // cwg2857: 2.7
+struct A {};
+struct B {
+ int operator+(A);
+};
+template
+struct D;
+
+void f(A* a, D* d) {
+ *d + *a;
Endilll wrote:
Thank you! I used one of
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92113
>From 1ae4b4e9c6b76269b7e279f798057900b5d39a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 15:45:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang] Add tests for CWG issues regarding completeness
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92113
>From 1ae4b4e9c6b76269b7e279f798057900b5d39a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 15:45:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Add tests for CWG issues regarding completeness
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92113
>From 1ae4b4e9c6b76269b7e279f798057900b5d39a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 15:45:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang] Add tests for CWG issues regarding completeness
Endilll wrote:
`clang-tidy/checkers/modernize/make-unique.cpp` is failing for whatever reason.
Otherwise LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92266
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
This patch allows attributes to be attached to C++20 concepts, implementing
[CWG2428](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2428.html).
>From a0d5a234431f3db2f0283ffa0909bf8c254aa611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92113
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
>From a0d5a234431f3db2f0283ffa0909bf8c254aa611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:20:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Implement CWG2428 "Deprecating a concept"
---
@@ -10698,7 +10698,7 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1815.html;>1815
CD4
Lifetime extension in aggregate initialization
-Clang 19
+Yes
Endilll wrote:
I updated the branch from `main`, now
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -10698,7 +10698,7 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1815.html;>1815
CD4
Lifetime extension in aggregate initialization
-Clang 19
+Yes
Endilll wrote:
This particular one is an unfortunate
@@ -45,6 +45,34 @@ void fallthrough(int n) {
#endif
}
+namespace cwg2428 { // cwg2428: 19
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+template
+concept C [[deprecated]] = true; // #C
Endilll wrote:
I added test with alternative attribute placing.
> It would also be good
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92318
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -45,6 +45,34 @@ void fallthrough(int n) {
#endif
}
+namespace cwg2428 { // cwg2428: 19
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+template
+concept C [[deprecated]] = true; // #C
Endilll wrote:
Non-standard spellings of this attribute are out of scope of the Core
@@ -45,6 +45,38 @@ void fallthrough(int n) {
#endif
}
+namespace cwg2428 { // cwg2428: 19
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+template
+concept C [[deprecated]] = true; // #cwg2428-C
+
+template
+[[deprecated]] concept C2 = true;
+// expected-error@-1 {{expected unqualified-id}}
+
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
>From a0d5a234431f3db2f0283ffa0909bf8c254aa611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:20:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Implement CWG2428 "Deprecating a concept"
---
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-05-16T17:53:14+03:00
New Revision: d1f96d4cfe25770827b5f819b6a9de6fef142c9c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1f96d4cfe25770827b5f819b6a9de6fef142c9c
DIFF:
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
>From a0d5a234431f3db2f0283ffa0909bf8c254aa611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:20:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang] Implement CWG2428 "Deprecating a concept"
---
@@ -45,6 +45,34 @@ void fallthrough(int n) {
#endif
}
+namespace cwg2428 { // cwg2428: 19
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+template
+concept C [[deprecated]] = true; // #C
Endilll wrote:
(MSVC spelling was removed.)
@@ -8092,6 +8092,18 @@ void Sema::checkCall(NamedDecl *FDecl, const
FunctionProtoType *Proto,
diagnoseArgDependentDiagnoseIfAttrs(FD, ThisArg, Args, Loc);
}
+void Sema::CheckConstrainedAuto(TypeSourceInfo *TS) {
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus20) {
@@ -8092,6 +8092,18 @@ void Sema::checkCall(NamedDecl *FDecl, const
FunctionProtoType *Proto,
diagnoseArgDependentDiagnoseIfAttrs(FD, ThisArg, Args, Loc);
}
+void Sema::CheckConstrainedAuto(TypeSourceInfo *TS) {
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus20) {
+if (const AutoType
@@ -45,6 +45,34 @@ void fallthrough(int n) {
#endif
}
+namespace cwg2428 { // cwg2428: 19
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+template
+concept C [[deprecated]] = true; // #C
Endilll wrote:
I added support for GNU and MSVC spellings.
Endilll wrote:
> Despite CWG2398 not being voted in yet, the status in
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e3f42b02a4129947ca2dd820bfb63ffed83027b7/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html#L14195-L14200
>
> should be updated.
The only way to update it is to add a test to `clang/test/CXX/drs`.
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -316,7 +318,8 @@ Parser::ParseConceptDefinition(const ParsedTemplateInfo
,
const IdentifierInfo *Id = Result.Identifier;
SourceLocation IdLoc = Result.getBeginLoc();
- DiagnoseAndSkipCXX11Attributes();
+ ParsedAttributes Attrs(AttrFactory);
+
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
>From a0d5a234431f3db2f0283ffa0909bf8c254aa611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:20:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang] Implement CWG2428 "Deprecating a concept"
---
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
>From a0d5a234431f3db2f0283ffa0909bf8c254aa611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:20:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Implement CWG2428 "Deprecating a concept"
---
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
>From a0d5a234431f3db2f0283ffa0909bf8c254aa611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:20:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang] Implement CWG2428 "Deprecating a concept"
---
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92436
This patch adds several const-qualified variants of existing member functions
to `SourceManager`.
I started with removing const qualification from `setNumCreatedFIDsForFileID`,
and removing `const_cast` in the
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
>From a0d5a234431f3db2f0283ffa0909bf8c254aa611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:20:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [clang] Implement CWG2428 "Deprecating a concept"
---
@@ -167,9 +167,11 @@ Parser::DeclGroupPtrTy
Parser::ParseTemplateDeclarationOrSpecialization(
LastParamListWasEmpty);
// Parse the actual template declaration.
- if (Tok.is(tok::kw_concept))
-return Actions.ConvertDeclToDeclGroup(
-
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92295
>From a0d5a234431f3db2f0283ffa0909bf8c254aa611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:20:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [clang] Implement CWG2428 "Deprecating a concept"
---
Endilll wrote:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90352 has been merged.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89484
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89484
>From 5985dbe47e052505278d60628bbb5ca751cc3b6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: offsetof <131769984+offse...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 02:35:09 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Allow
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90352
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
CI has been failing because of unrelated `Clang :: Driver/amdgpu-toolchain.c`
test. I'm merging this as is.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90352
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
It'd also be nice if someone can share a reproducer that crashes on trunk but
not on 18.1.0 without names reduced to 1-2 letters. Definitely would speed up
the work towards the fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
___
Endilll wrote:
To be clear, we're asking for a reproducer with normal names first and
foremost. I'm thankful for @bgra8 help running `creduce` over what they had,
but we wouldn't had this particular conversation if they also provided full
original reproducer that we could run `creduce` on
Endilll wrote:
> but not having a convenient reproducer is not a good reason to keep the ToT
> Clang in a broken state
As someone who worked on a different reduction of Sam's reproducer yesterday,
and spent whopping 8 hours of work time to get
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82217
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
This patch moves OpenACC parts of `Sema` into a separate class `SemaOpenACC`
that is placed in a separate header `Sema/SemaOpenACC.h`. This patch is
intended to be a model of factoring things out of `Sema`, so
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Endilll wrote:
Can you please update your branch with `main`? I'd like to make sure that your
new functions in `Sema`
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
>From 491fc16c777aff8b22893da1cdeb8d137cf28871 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:16:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Respect field alignment when evaluating layout
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78000
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
Physical separation of parts of `Sema` while improving incremental compile
times means we have to rely on forward declarations, which lead to additional
level of indirection at runtime in the form of `Sema` containing pointers to
its components, and components containing a
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84303
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1162,6 +1162,11 @@ class Sema final {
/// CurContext - This is the current declaration context of parsing.
DeclContext *CurContext;
+ SemaOpenACC () {
+assert(OpenACCPtr);
Endilll wrote:
Given that moving a hot path getter to out-of-line
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84303
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes CHECK
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
@@ -19185,7 +19185,8 @@ static bool isLayoutCompatible(ASTContext , EnumDecl
*ED1, EnumDecl *ED2) {
/// Check if two fields are layout-compatible.
static bool isLayoutCompatible(ASTContext , FieldDecl *Field1,
- FieldDecl *Field2) {
+
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
>From 491fc16c777aff8b22893da1cdeb8d137cf28871 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:16:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Respect field alignment when evaluating layout
@@ -19185,7 +19185,7 @@ static bool isLayoutCompatible(ASTContext , EnumDecl
*ED1, EnumDecl *ED2) {
/// Check if two fields are layout-compatible.
Endilll wrote:
Good catch! CWG2586 I implement here basically establish a different set of
rules for layout
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
>From 491fc16c777aff8b22893da1cdeb8d137cf28871 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:16:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Respect field alignment when evaluating layout
@@ -19185,7 +19185,7 @@ static bool isLayoutCompatible(ASTContext , EnumDecl
*ED1, EnumDecl *ED2) {
/// Check if two fields are layout-compatible.
Endilll wrote:
After an offline discussion, we agreed to keep the boolean, and to add an
additional assert to
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84303
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
>From 23f4208fb9978370f59cae16db0747acb3e2c906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:01:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Factor out OpenACC part of `Sema`
This patch
@@ -63,17 +67,17 @@ void Sema::ActOnOpenACCConstruct(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
// here as these constructs do not take any arguments.
break;
default:
-Diag(StartLoc, diag::warn_acc_construct_unimplemented) << K;
+Sema.Diag(StartLoc,
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
Changes to `Sema.h` look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84459
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes CHECK
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
-fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors | llvm-cxxfilt -n | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes CHECK
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -emit-llvm -o -
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83715
>From 59a558a653098c1b96b47cffc62b1f3bf1cb92d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 12:21:17 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Add some CodeGen tests for CWG 4xx issues
This
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
Can you resolve merge conflicts, so that I can review changes to `Sema.h`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78000
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84193
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
>From 23f4208fb9978370f59cae16db0747acb3e2c906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:01:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang] Factor out OpenACC part of `Sema`
This patch
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+//===- SemaOpenACC.h - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79035
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me. Thank you for putting new functions in all
the right places!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Endilll wrote:
> This is an early PR to solicit comments on the overall approach and a number
> of outstanding questions.
You should advertise this elsewhere (e.g. in RFC thread), or remove the draft
status so that reviewers can see this as something they should provide feedback
on.
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80040
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85032
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1996,6 +1996,30 @@ Here is an example:
}];
}
+def AssumeDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatStmt;
+ let Heading = "assume";
+ let Content = [{
+The ``assume`` attribute is used to indicate to the optimizer that a
+certain condition can be assumed to be true
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84303
This patch covers
[CWG519](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/519.html) "Null pointer
preservation in `void*` conversions",
[CWG571](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/571.html) "References declared
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84313
This patch implements
[CWG2586](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2583.html) "Common initial
sequence should consider over-alignment". Note that alignment of union members
doesn't have to match, as layout
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77890
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
>From 23f4208fb9978370f59cae16db0747acb3e2c906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:01:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Factor out OpenACC part of `Sema`
This patch
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83715
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1162,6 +1162,11 @@ class Sema final {
/// CurContext - This is the current declaration context of parsing.
DeclContext *CurContext;
+ SemaOpenACC () {
Endilll wrote:
I'm not too keen to adhere to our style guide here, as this adds noise for
users
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+//===- SemaOpenACC.h - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+//===- SemaOpenACC.h - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+//===- SemaOpenACC.h - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
Endilll wrote:
You might want to include a test from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85256#issuecomment-2031815104
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87274
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
I can land this for you after CI passes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87737
This is a follow-up to #81506. Since `__is_layout_compatible()` is a C++
intrinsic
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87744
[CWG392](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/392.html) "Use of full
expression lvalue before temporary destruction". We're testing that `operator
bool()` is called before destructor of `C`.
I'm also marking
901 - 1000 of 1398 matches
Mail list logo
