[PATCH] D104381: [analyzer] Added a test case for PR46264

ASDenysPetrov added a comment. @NoQ Just a ping Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104381/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104381 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

[PATCH] D104381: [analyzer] Added a test case for PR46264

ASDenysPetrov added a comment. In D104381#2838902 , @NoQ wrote: > I bisected. This bug was fixed intentionally by D85817 > , forgot to close I guess. Wow! Nice! It seems that we've duplicated the test file. I think we

[PATCH] D104381: [analyzer] Added a test case for PR46264

NoQ added a comment. I bisected. This bug was fixed intentionally by D85817 , forgot to close I guess. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104381/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104381

[PATCH] D104381: [analyzer] Added a test case for PR46264

This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds. This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rGe76c008c906a: [analyzer] Added a test case for PR46264 (authored by ASDenysPetrov). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST

[PATCH] D104381: [analyzer] Added a test case for PR46264

NoQ accepted this revision. NoQ added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Cool, thanks! Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/diagnostics/PR46264.cpp:7-8 +// `3ed8ebc2f6b8172bed48cc5986d3b7af4cfca1bc` from 24.05.2020. +namespace ns1 { +namespace a { +class b

[PATCH] D104381: [analyzer] Added a test case for PR46264

ASDenysPetrov updated this revision to Diff 353992. ASDenysPetrov added a comment. Updated due to comments. Confirm crash on commit `3ed8ebc2f6b8172bed48cc5986d3b7af4cfca1bc` from 24.05.2020. @NoQ ? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104381/new/

[PATCH] D104381: [analyzer] Added a test case for PR46264

ASDenysPetrov added a comment. @NoQ: > I guess there might be some value in building an older Clang from around when > the bug was reported so that to see if the crash was indeed there and we're > not just reproducing it wrong. It would also allow us to understand where we > fixed it through

[PATCH] D104381: [analyzer] Added a test case for PR46264

NoQ added a comment. Thanks! I guess there might be some value in building an older Clang from around when the bug was reported so that to see if the crash was indeed there and we're not just reproducing it wrong. It would also allow us to understand where we fixed it through bisecting. But I

[PATCH] D104381: [analyzer] Added a test case for PR46264

ASDenysPetrov created this revision. ASDenysPetrov added reviewers: NoQ, steakhal. ASDenysPetrov added a project: clang. Herald added subscribers: manas, dkrupp, donat.nagy, Szelethus, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, szepet, baloghadamsoftware, xazax.hun. ASDenysPetrov requested review of this