steakhal added a comment.
I'm hesitating about landing this.
I think I'll mark this flag deprecated instead, to emit a warning when using
this flag.
So, `clang-15` would emit a warning for this, and `clang-16` and above we can
remove this flag completely.
WDYT @martong ?
Repository:
rG LLVM
steakhal updated this revision to Diff 430978.
steakhal added a comment.
Mention this removal in the release notes.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067
Files:
martong added a comment.
Uhh, ohh, don't forget to reflect this change in the ReleaseNotes.rst, so urers
will be notified!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067
martong accepted this revision.
martong added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
> However, this arises a couple of burning questions.
>
> Should the cc1 frontend still accept this flag - to keep tools/users passing
> this flag directly to cc1 (which is unsupported,
steakhal created this revision.
steakhal added reviewers: NoQ, martong, Szelethus.
Herald added subscribers: carlosgalvezp, manas, ASDenysPetrov, dkrupp,
donat.nagy, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, rnkovacs, szepet, baloghadamsoftware,
xazax.hun.
Herald added a project: All.
steakhal requested
