Re: [PATCH] D15791: Disable generating movt on FreeBSD

2016-01-11 Thread Davide Italiano via cfe-commits
davide closed this revision. davide added a comment. Close, this went in a while ago. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D15791 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

Re: [PATCH] D15791: Disable generating movt on FreeBSD

2015-12-29 Thread Andrew Turner via cfe-commits
andrew added a comment. Can someone commit with the FIXME comment? I'm unable to do it myself. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D15791 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org

Re: [PATCH] D15791: Disable generating movt on FreeBSD

2015-12-29 Thread Davide Italiano via cfe-commits
davide accepted this revision. davide added a reviewer: davide. davide added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. LGTM Comment at: lib/Driver/Tools.cpp:941 @@ -940,3 +940,3 @@ - // The kext linker doesn't know how to deal with movw/movt. - if

Re: [PATCH] D15791: Disable generating movt on FreeBSD

2015-12-29 Thread Davide Italiano via cfe-commits
davide added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15791#317172, @dim wrote: > @davide, any idea whether lld will be able to handle movt correctly? If so, > we might want to make this dependent on `-fuse-ld=bfd` or `-fuse-ld=lld` ? lld/AArch64 can't still handle that properly, so I'd rather

Re: [PATCH] D15791: Disable generating movt on FreeBSD

2015-12-27 Thread Ed Maste via cfe-commits
emaste added a comment. > @davide, any idea whether lld will be able to handle movt correctly? If so, > we might want to make this dependent on -fuse-ld=bfd or -fuse-ld=lld ? I'm sure lld will handle everything we need eventually (if it does not already), but I'm not sure it's reasonable to

Re: [PATCH] D15791: Disable generating movt on FreeBSD

2015-12-27 Thread Dimitry Andric via cfe-commits
dim added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15791#317175, @emaste wrote: > > @davide, any idea whether lld will be able to handle movt correctly? If so, > > we might want to make this dependent on -fuse-ld=bfd or -fuse-ld=lld ? > > > I'm sure lld will handle everything we need eventually