Re: [PATCH] D16697: Updating .debug_line section version information to match DWARF version.

2016-01-29 Thread Adrian Prantl via cfe-commits
> > There is now a public bot that runs the LLDB testsuite on Darwin > (http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/LLDB/) so you’ll find out immediately :-) > LLDB can be fixed, I’m not too worried about it. > > There are, however, also DWARF consumers that are not debuggers that will > read the line

[PATCH] D16697: Updating .debug_line section version information to match DWARF version.

2016-01-28 Thread Katya Romanova via cfe-commits
kromanova created this revision. kromanova added reviewers: dblaikie, echristo, probinson. kromanova added a subscriber: cfe-commits. kromanova set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM. Hello, The compiler always emits .debug_line version 2, though some opcodes from DWARF 3 (e.g.

Re: [PATCH] D16697: Updating .debug_line section version information to match DWARF version.

2016-01-28 Thread Adrian Prantl via cfe-commits
> On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:57 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > > +Adrian for Apple/LLDB perspective > > One way to merge the tests would be to add another command line argument into > DwarfDebug (see the way the split-dwarf command line argument is used), just > for testing

Re: [PATCH] D16697: Updating .debug_line section version information to match DWARF version.

2016-01-28 Thread David Blaikie via cfe-commits
+Adrian for Apple/LLDB perspective One way to merge the tests would be to add another command line argument into DwarfDebug (see the way the split-dwarf command line argument is used), just for testing purposes. The command line argument can override the value specified in the metadata - so you