Author: Jan Korous
Date: 2022-09-21T17:26:09-07:00
New Revision: 85d97aac80b8e7689a6d957441054aa817bbb192

URL: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/85d97aac80b8e7689a6d957441054aa817bbb192
DIFF: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/85d97aac80b8e7689a6d957441054aa817bbb192.diff

LOG: [analyzer] Support implicit parameter 'self' in path note

showBRParamDiagnostics assumed stores happen only via function parameters while 
that
can also happen via implicit parameters like 'self' or 'this'.
The regression test caused a failed assert in the original cast to ParmVarDecl.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133815

Added: 
    clang/test/Analysis/path-notes-impl-param.m

Modified: 
    clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp 
b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp
index 3796ad51694ae..4f23af07e3ae4 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp
@@ -1340,13 +1340,12 @@ static void showBRDiagnostics(llvm::raw_svector_ostream 
&OS, StoreInfo SI) {
 static void showBRParamDiagnostics(llvm::raw_svector_ostream &OS,
                                    StoreInfo SI) {
   const auto *VR = cast<VarRegion>(SI.Dest);
-  const auto *Param = cast<ParmVarDecl>(VR->getDecl());
+  const auto *D = VR->getDecl();
 
   OS << "Passing ";
 
   if (isa<loc::ConcreteInt>(SI.Value)) {
-    OS << (isObjCPointer(Param) ? "nil object reference"
-                                : "null pointer value");
+    OS << (isObjCPointer(D) ? "nil object reference" : "null pointer value");
 
   } else if (SI.Value.isUndef()) {
     OS << "uninitialized value";
@@ -1361,12 +1360,19 @@ static void 
showBRParamDiagnostics(llvm::raw_svector_ostream &OS,
     OS << "value";
   }
 
-  // Printed parameter indexes are 1-based, not 0-based.
-  unsigned Idx = Param->getFunctionScopeIndex() + 1;
-  OS << " via " << Idx << llvm::getOrdinalSuffix(Idx) << " parameter";
-  if (VR->canPrintPretty()) {
-    OS << " ";
-    VR->printPretty(OS);
+  if (const auto *Param = dyn_cast<ParmVarDecl>(VR->getDecl())) {
+    // Printed parameter indexes are 1-based, not 0-based.
+    unsigned Idx = Param->getFunctionScopeIndex() + 1;
+    OS << " via " << Idx << llvm::getOrdinalSuffix(Idx) << " parameter";
+    if (VR->canPrintPretty()) {
+      OS << " ";
+      VR->printPretty(OS);
+    }
+  } else if (const auto *ImplParam = dyn_cast<ImplicitParamDecl>(D)) {
+    if (ImplParam->getParameterKind() ==
+        ImplicitParamDecl::ImplicitParamKind::ObjCSelf) {
+      OS << " via implicit parameter 'self'";
+    }
   }
 }
 

diff  --git a/clang/test/Analysis/path-notes-impl-param.m 
b/clang/test/Analysis/path-notes-impl-param.m
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..cc1069ab96c36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Analysis/path-notes-impl-param.m
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,osx.cocoa.RetainCount 
-analyzer-output=text -verify %s
+
+@protocol NSObject
+@end
+
+@interface NSObject <NSObject> {}
+- (id)init;
++ (id)alloc;
+- (id)autorelease;
+@end
+
+@interface Foo : NSObject
+@property(nonatomic) int bar;
+@end
+
+@implementation Foo
+-(int)bar {
+  return 0;
+}
+@end
+
+int baz() {
+  Foo *f = [Foo alloc];
+  // expected-note@-1 {{'f' initialized here}}
+  // expected-note@-2 {{Method returns an instance of Foo with a +1 retain 
count}}
+
+  return f.bar;
+  // expected-warning@-1 {{Potential leak of an object stored into 'self' 
[osx.cocoa.RetainCount]}}
+  // expected-note@-2 {{Passing value via implicit parameter 'self'}}
+  // expected-note@-3 {{Object leaked: object allocated and stored into 'self' 
is not referenced later in this execution path and has a retain count of +1}}
+}


        
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to