Author: Mark de Wever Date: 2023-02-22T17:17:36+01:00 New Revision: a7b6978285c1c07600d1762b206c1dcec35fe6c8
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a7b6978285c1c07600d1762b206c1dcec35fe6c8 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a7b6978285c1c07600d1762b206c1dcec35fe6c8.diff LOG: [clang][doc] Removes obsolete comment. After reading about the documentation improvements on LLVM weekly this part seems obsolete. Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144497 Added: Modified: clang/docs/StandardCPlusPlusModules.rst Removed: ################################################################################ diff --git a/clang/docs/StandardCPlusPlusModules.rst b/clang/docs/StandardCPlusPlusModules.rst index d4db37ea6e2e2..8447a44e3f8db 100644 --- a/clang/docs/StandardCPlusPlusModules.rst +++ b/clang/docs/StandardCPlusPlusModules.rst @@ -603,16 +603,6 @@ and add the label ``clang:modules`` (if you have permissions for that). For higher level support for proposals, you could visit https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html. -Support for clang-scan-deps -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - -The support for clang-scan-deps may be the most urgent problem for modules now. -Without the support for clang-scan-deps, it's hard to involve build systems. -This means that users could only play with modules through makefiles or by writing a parser by hand. -It blocks more uses for modules, which will block more defect reports or requirements. - -This is tracked in: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51792. - Ambiguous deduction guide ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
