Reverted in r267865.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Dmitry Polukhin wrote:
> So it seems that there is an agreement that Clang don't need this MSVC
> "feature" so I'll revert my patch tomorrow when I get to the office.
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Stephan
So it seems that there is an agreement that Clang don't need this MSVC
"feature" so I'll revert my patch tomorrow when I get to the office.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Stephan T. Lavavej <
s...@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
> [Richard Smith]
> > You can find a description of the problem
[Richard Smith]
> You can find a description of the problem in http://llvm.org/PR27337
> Brief summary:
> The WTL bug is the missing 'public' on the second base class on this line:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/wtl/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/wtl/Samples/MDIDocVw/mainfrm.h#l636
> The C1xx bug is that it
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Richard Smith
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Stephan T. Lavavej via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> [Dmitry Polukhin]
>> > As for 'A*' to 'B*" case, indeed it is not very common and it looks
>> like
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Stephan T. Lavavej via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> [Dmitry Polukhin]
> > As for 'A*' to 'B*" case, indeed it is not very common and it looks like
> someone just forgot to specify 'public'.
>
> If we're doing something gratuitously
[Dmitry Polukhin]
> As for 'A*' to 'B*" case, indeed it is not very common and it looks like
> someone just forgot to specify 'public'.
If we're doing something gratuitously nonconformant in MS product code or even
sample code, you should report it to us, so we can fix it upstream, instead of
Is it needed to parse system headers? In general, we implement things like
this if they're needed for system headers but don't otherwise.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Dmitry Polukhin via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I added example with 'B*' to 'A*' just to make sure
I added example with 'B*' to 'A*' just to make sure that my patch doesn't
break it accidentally in MSVC mode.
As for 'A*' to 'B*" case, indeed it is not very common and it looks like
someone just forgot to specify 'public'. I tried to find more real world
examples in public source codes but
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:04 PM, David Majnemer via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Visual Studio 2015 (19.00.23720.0) reports:
>
> error C2243: 'static_cast': conversion from 'B *' to 'A *' exists, but is
> inaccessible
>
Right, it's the other direction ('A *' to 'B *') that
Visual Studio 2015 (19.00.23720.0) reports:
error C2243: 'static_cast': conversion from 'B *' to 'A *' exists, but is
inaccessible
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> As noted in PR27337, this only occurs in one WTL sample, and
As noted in PR27337, this only occurs in one WTL sample, and we have no
evidence that it actually occurs in real code. Have you seen uses of this
in the wild? We generally don't want to add compatibility for MSVC bugs
unless there's some real-world motivation.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:21 AM,
11 matches
Mail list logo