This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rC324062: [Sema] Add implicit members even for invalid
CXXRecordDecls (authored by ibiryukov, committed by ).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42810?vs=132443=132546#toc
Repository:
bkramer accepted this revision.
bkramer added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
lg
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42810
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ilya-biryukov added a comment.
The following assertion from `DeclContext::removeDecl` was failing before:
assert((D->NextInContextAndBits.getPointer() || D == LastDecl) &&
"decl is not in decls list");
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42810
ilya-biryukov created this revision.
ilya-biryukov added a reviewer: bkramer.
It should be safe, since other code paths are already generating
implicit members even in invalid CXXRecordDecls (e.g. lookup).
If we don't generate implicit members on CXXRecordDecl's completion,
they will be
