Thanks Richard. I've fixed the tests in r284289.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Richard Smith
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Oh, I have another idea: could it be that you're also turning some
>> optimization o
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Oh, I have another idea: could it be that you're also turning some
> optimization on when UBSan is enabled? Note that the operator new/operator
> delete pair is elidable in each of these tests, an
Oh, I have another idea: could it be that you're also turning some
optimization on when UBSan is enabled? Note that the operator new/operator
delete pair is elidable in each of these tests, and Clang will remove the
calls when compiling with optimizations enabled.
That's it. The UBSAN tests build
Oh, I have another idea: could it be that you're also turning some
optimization on when UBSan is enabled? Note that the operator new/operator
delete pair is elidable in each of these tests, and Clang will remove the
calls when compiling with optimizations enabled.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:38 PM,
UBSAN may not be replacing the function, but it is doing something weird at
the codegen level. I looked into this a while ago but never sorted it out.
Either way I'll clarify the comments and add the missing reset() calls.
Unfortunately the tests still fail in the same way.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 a
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: ericwf
> Date: Fri Oct 14 02:49:15 2016
> New Revision: 284210
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=284210&view=rev
> Log:
> XFAIL aligned allocation test failures with UBSAN
