Re: r326622 - Don't claim that va_start has special semantic checks

2018-03-03 Thread Nico Weber via cfe-commits
The 't' was there because __builtin_va_start and __va_start had them, but those do in fact have custom sema checking so copying that was in fact incorrect. Thanks for fixing my bugs! On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Reid Kleckner via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: rnk

r326622 - Don't claim that va_start has special semantic checks

2018-03-02 Thread Reid Kleckner via cfe-commits
Author: rnk Date: Fri Mar 2 13:41:08 2018 New Revision: 326622 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=326622=rev Log: Don't claim that va_start has special semantic checks We don't have special checks for BI_va_start in Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall, so setting the 't' flag for va_start