Hi Martin,
Thanks! It's good to learn some GCC internal details :)
Cheers,
Alex
On 12/18/20 5:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/18/20 3:42 AM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> I sent you an email, but I received a "delivery failure".
>> If you're reading this from a
Ping
On 12/15/20 2:30 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
> Cc: Martin Sebor
> Cc: Dave Martin
> ---
>
> v6:
> - GCC has always exposed 'void *', as Martin Sebor noted.
> It's Clang (and maybe others) that (following GCC's
Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
Cc: Martin Sebor
Cc: Dave Martin
---
v6:
- GCC has always exposed 'void *', as Martin Sebor noted.
It's Clang (and maybe others) that (following GCC's docs)
exposed 'char *'.
man2/cacheflush.2 | 24
Hi Martin,
I sent you an email, but I received a "delivery failure".
If you're reading this from a list, could you answer, please?
Thanks,
Alex
On 12/14/20 11:34 PM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> Thanks for the correction!
> Then the prototypes that changes from
Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
man2/cacheflush.2 | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man2/cacheflush.2 b/man2/cacheflush.2
index aba625721..7a2eed506 100644
--- a/man2/cacheflush.2
+++ b/man2/cacheflush.2
@@ -86,6
On 12/14/20 12:43 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
man2/cacheflush.2 | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man2/cacheflush.2 b/man2/cacheflush.2
On 12/11/20 11:14 AM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) via Gcc wrote:
It looks like GCC recently moved from 'char *' to 'void *'.
This SO question[1] (4 years ago) quotes the GCC docs
and they had 'char *'.
__builtin___clear_cache in GCC has always been declared to take
void*. The signature in
