Another option, of course, is that cffi-toolchain be moved to asdf
3.2.x and becomes asdf/toolchain, though there might be a slightly
painful transition if and when cffi starts to use it.
In any case, this code is ready to be committed and a definite improvement.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •R
> may I attract your attention to pull request #112 ?
> https://github.com/cffi/cffi/pull/112
i don't feel proficient enough in this topic to push this
patch. anyone else?
but while we are at it, i've been considering to refactor
cffi-toolchain to use the cffi/toolchain ASDF naming convention, a
Dear CFFI developers,
may I attract your attention to pull request #112 ?
https://github.com/cffi/cffi/pull/112
It adds among other things the ability to deliver an application with
C code statically linked into a SBCL runtime (or CLISP, or ECL, or
MKCL, though these are less stable).
I underst
