Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Not really. The prototype stuff of Moose is where you want to start, and it
has a different interface. If you just pulled in Class::Prototyped, you'd
have a lot of potential conflicts, especially around anonymous classes.
I see. I'm not trying to anger you, but I w
The heir apparent to the CGI::Prototype namespace should support
Class::Prototype-styled objects. Under the licensing terms of CGIP, you're
free to derive whatever you want and call it whatever you want, but please
reserve CGI::Prototype (or names close to it) for something that supports
prototyp
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> The heir apparent to the CGI::Prototype namespace should support
> Class::Prototype-styled objects.
Right. I'm not suggesting an heir apparent. I'm suggesting an additional
module in the distribution, along with associated test suite.
This module would extend on the
> "Terrence" == Terrence Brannon writes:
Terrence> I dont want to fork and start a separate distro, just add
Terrence> CGI::Prototype::Moose to the CGIP distro.
And I'm saying that's the wrong name for that, if it's not about replacing all
of what CGIP already does, including prototype inher
