Hi Folks
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 08:24 -0500, Jason A. Crome wrote:
I don't disagree that the community wouldn't benefit from that. Just
pointing out that would be the path of least resistance :) I've never
been sold on our current wiki software, personally and would like to
see something
We could just add reCAPTCHA to the wiki and be done with it. I don't
believe it's difficult to do.
Jason A. Crome / CromeDome
DEVNET, Inc. - Cutting Edge Property Tax and Appraisal Solutions -
http://www.devnetinc.com
--
AIM: TheOneCromeDome
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/cromedome
Blog:
* Jason A. Crome [17/05/2011 14:58] :
We could just add reCAPTCHA to the wiki and be done with it. I don't
believe it's difficult to do.
If we're going to update the wiki software, we might as well go all the
way and fix all as much stuff as possible. People have asked for a
number of
I don't disagree that the community wouldn't benefit from that. Just
pointing out that would be the path of least resistance :) I've never
been sold on our current wiki software, personally and would like to
see something different.
Jason A. Crome / CromeDome
DEVNET, Inc. - Cutting Edge
Hi Jason
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 08:24 -0500, Jason A. Crome wrote:
I don't disagree that the community wouldn't benefit from that. Just
pointing out that would be the path of least resistance :) I've never
been sold on our current wiki software, personally and would like to
see something
Hi Folks
I removed the weight-loss spam 30 minutes ago, and now it's back,
suggesting the spammer is monitoring his efforts. No point in fixing it
again (in the short term), I'd say.
--
Ron Savage
http://savage.net.au/
Ph: 0421 920 622
# CGI::Application community mailing list
Hi Josh
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 17:52 -0400, Joshua Miller wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Jason A. Crome cromed...@gmail.com wrote:
We could just add reCAPTCHA to the wiki and be done with it. I don't
believe it's difficult to do.
I may be wrong, but looking at the changes
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Lyle wrote:
Me and Mark looked into changing the Wiki some time back. I've got a
full blown site redesign sitting around somewhere. When we had
discussion on the list the general view was that we really should be
using a cgi-app based Wiki. I found an old CPAN module for
On 05/14/2011 02:20 AM, Joshua Miller wrote:
Is there a reason the home page can be modified by anyone sans-registration
and sans-approval?
No good reason. Does anyone want to be the wiki admin and see about
making that change with the current software, or moving us to a
better/newer wiki
Hi Mark
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 08:23 -0400, Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 05/14/2011 02:20 AM, Joshua Miller wrote:
Is there a reason the home page can be modified by anyone sans-registration
and sans-approval?
No good reason. Does anyone want to be the wiki admin and see about
making that
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote:
Hi Mark
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 08:23 -0400, Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 05/14/2011 02:20 AM, Joshua Miller wrote:
Is there a reason the home page can be modified by anyone
sans-registration
and sans-approval?
No good
Is there a reason the home page can be modified by anyone sans-registration
and sans-approval?
I noticed some spam links were added, and removed them. It's easy enough to
remove, but seems like some sort of protection wouldn't hurt (email address
registration with captcha, or require manual
Hi Josh
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 02:20 -0400, Joshua Miller wrote:
Is there a reason the home page can be modified by anyone sans-registration
and sans-approval?
I guess it was to lower the barrier to editing.
I noticed some spam links were added, and removed them. It's easy enough to
remove,
13 matches
Mail list logo
