subject:"\[cgiapp\] Re\: CGI\:\:Application\:\:Server patches now peer reviewed and recommended \(was\: Re\: \:\:Server vs \:\:Dispatch\:\:Server\: Worth having both\?\)"

Re: [cgiapp] Re: CGI::Application::Server patches now peer reviewed and recommended (was: Re: ::Server vs ::Dispatch::Server: Worth having both?)

2008-11-02 Thread Ricardo SIGNES

* Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-01T22:15:50] I'm willing to be a CO-MAINT for CGI::Application::Server, if that would help move this along. I know you have dozens of other modules you maintain that could keep you busy. Sorry, the problem has actually been that *I* am comaint

[cgiapp] Re: CGI::Application::Server patches now peer reviewed and recommended (was: Re: ::Server vs ::Dispatch::Server: Worth having both?)

2008-11-01 Thread Mark Stosberg

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:29:55 -0400 Ricardo SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-23T23:07:34] I realized that I left some of the original code commented out in the static-content.patch branch. I cleaned it up, tested it again, updated the copy at