I agree it's a little self-defeating to eval the error run mode. What
would you do with the caught exception other than die with $@ anyways?
You certainly wouldn't try to run the error mode again.
-Stephen
Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 2004-08-26, Kinyon, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 2004-08-23, Kinyon, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the response. Your counter-points are sound. While I
understand your proposal would be backwards compatible, I have concerns
that it could promote what I think is poor application design-- sending
un-trapped perl
I have implemented a die handler for a group of
modules that I have integrated. Just like I wanted
them to all use the same config file and object, I
wanted them to die the same way.
This proved trickier than it sounds given mod_perl's
special way of diing - using the Apache exit function.
Michael Peters wrote:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 2004-08-23, Kinyon, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the response. Your counter-points are sound. While I
understand your proposal would be backwards compatible, I have concerns
that it could promote what I think is poor application design--
::A have seperately written
this type functionality but that the code hasn't made its way to the wiki or to CPAN.
Cheers
--Fred
-Original Message-
From: Michael Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [cgiapp] Re: Proposal
or recursion that goes too
deep.
Not everyone can use Apache's ErrorDocument.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Michael Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [cgiapp] Re: Proposal for Error handling runmode
Mark Stosberg
