On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Lyle webmas...@cosmicperl.com wrote:
Considering that almost everything is already on CPAN, then most plugins are
likely to be wrappers, adding extra benefits like lazy loading and framework
specific functions. It would be wrong to try and recreate things that
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com wrote:
Using (or creating plugins) for Catalyst is discouraged, because there are
better methods for doing the same thing.
It was encouraged before it was discouraged. There were dozens of
wrapper plugins on CPAN the last
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:54:44 +1100
Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote:
Hi Folks
OK. I've got this going, but it just reads and writes files.
I'm thinking of storing the tags in a tree, thereby allowing a visit()
method.
Does anyone know of a pure Perl tree manager?
I have never used
Hi Mark
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 11:40 -0500, Mark Stosberg wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:54:44 +1100
Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote:
Hi Folks
OK. I've got this going, but it just reads and writes files.
I'm thinking of storing the tags in a tree, thereby allowing a visit()
Hi Ron,
Ron Savage wrote:
Tree, for example, uses Scalar::Util, which uses List::Util, which uses
XS.
I've drawn similar wrong conclusions several times before. List::Util
drops back to Pure Perl if XS is not available. From Util.pm:-
# This code is only compiled if the XS did not load
Hi Lyle
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 00:07 +, Lyle wrote:
Hi Ron,
Ron Savage wrote:
Tree, for example, uses Scalar::Util, which uses List::Util, which uses
XS.
I've drawn similar wrong conclusions several times before. List::Util
drops back to Pure Perl if XS is not available.
