On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Peter Masiar wrote:
Jesse asked me to remove from the CGI app list nightly email
about which pages were changed on CGI app FAQ Twiki.
Oh, come on. Once the wiki settles down a bit it shouldn't be too noisy.
If people got the latest wiki notifications within the first few
On Thursday, July 10, 2003, at 10:40 AM, Jesse Erlbaum wrote:
One other note: You may want to upgrade to Perl 5.6.1. 5.6.0 has some
significant bugs which were fixed in the next release.
Gustavo:
I've found 5.8.0 to run on OS X 10.2 to be a good choice.
CGI::Application compiled w/o
[cross-posts removed]
On Thursday, July 10, 2003, at 02:29 PM, ryan whippo wrote:
I have an application that passes params around in the url. We need to
hide these for security reasons. We also don't want to have to change
a
lot of code. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ryan
Ryan;
I imagine you're
Can you not encrypt the param to make it harder to get the gist of
what it does?
You can. This only makes affecting your system as easy/hard as figuring
out your algorithm. Historically, that's no real protection at all.
The user can feed in some values, see what encrypted values come out,
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:01:00 -0400, Brett Sanger wrote:
Hi Folks
I was hoping it will be low-noise reminder about existing
Nightly is not low-noise, IMNSHO
Agreed.
knowledge-base for URL related to CGI app, but of course
however, asking Jesse to place it in the sig of the list (where
I have an application that passes params around in the url. We need to
hide these for security reasons. We also don't want to have to change a
lot of code. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ryan
-
Web Archive:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 01:29:06PM -0500, ryan whippo wrote:
I have an application that passes params around in the url. We need to
hide these for security reasons. We also don't want to have to change a
lot of code. Any ideas?
Hiding params doesn't add any level of real security. So long
