Hi
Amazing. I don't get it get.
On 12/12/12 01:29, Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 12/10/2012 06:05 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Mark
On 11/12/12 08:38, Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 12/10/2012 04:27 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Mark
Ah, yes. No 'use Moo', means new() is not generated, so you don't end up
Hi Mark
On 11/12/12 01:13, Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 12/08/2012 09:23 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Mark
See https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Moo
As I said in my last msg on that thread, I'd better re-write the article
:-((.
The summary I see from there is that in a Moo Role,
Hi Mark
See https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Moo
As I said in my last msg on that thread, I'd better re-write the article
:-((.
On 27/11/12 09:00, Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Mark
On 27/11/12 01:51, Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 11/21/2012 07:46 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Mark
On
On 11/21/2012 07:46 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Mark
On 22/11/12 01:25, Mark Stosberg wrote:
What I have now is for Moose and a bit project-specific, but I plan to
make CPAN-ready Moo-based variants at some point.
Just for record, you can't use a BUILD sub with Moo. I'm just trying to
Hi Mark
On 27/11/12 01:51, Mark Stosberg wrote:
On 11/21/2012 07:46 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Mark
On 22/11/12 01:25, Mark Stosberg wrote:
What I have now is for Moose and a bit project-specific, but I plan to
make CPAN-ready Moo-based variants at some point.
Just for record, you can't
Hi
Hmm. Perhaps I should write an article too.
I've sent off to chromatic (for publication on perl.com) my 2nd article
on lexing and parsing with Marpa::R2, so I've made a start on this new
article, which will appear on blogs.perl.org.
--
Ron Savage
http://savage.net.au/
Ph: 0421 920 622
What I have now is for Moose and a bit project-specific, but I plan to
make CPAN-ready Moo-based variants at some point.
Would you support Moo /and/ Moose variants long term? I wouldn't bother
myself.
Or are you saying the public versions would use Moo?
I doubt it. We'd like to switch
Hi Mark
On 22/11/12 01:25, Mark Stosberg wrote:
What I have now is for Moose and a bit project-specific, but I plan to
make CPAN-ready Moo-based variants at some point.
Just for record, you can't use a BUILD sub with Moo. I'm just trying to
write work-around code now, using the construct:
Hi
I am planning to change CGI::Snapp's base class from Hash::FieldHash to
Moos (sic).
I understand this will cause some disruption to users of CGI::Snapp (if
any :-), but there will be a number of benefits. And it's these benefits
which has convinced me to propose this.
The new CGI::Snapp
I am planning to change CGI::Snapp's base class from Hash::FieldHash to
Moos (sic).
I would definitely support using one of the Moose-compatible projects. I
am thinking of moving PSGI::Application from Any::Moose to Moo.
I looked at 'Moos' a bit as well. I factored in that Moo has quickly
Hi Mark
On 21/11/12 12:49, Mark Stosberg wrote:
I am planning to change CGI::Snapp's base class from Hash::FieldHash to
Moos (sic).
I would definitely support using one of the Moose-compatible projects. I
am thinking of moving PSGI::Application from Any::Moose to Moo.
I just had another
11 matches
Mail list logo
