Cees, this is most excellent work! I'm very excited that you've started
on this. I will be happy to help out when I get back next week,
assuming you're not finished already :)
I'd be all good with the full verbose names -- no ambiguity.
CGI::Application:Plugin:Authentication
Hi All,
I am finally starting up work on the Authentication plugin for
CGI::App again. This is purely an interface for Authentication.
Authorization will will be handled in a separate (related) plugin.
What I have done this time is generate documentation and usage
examples first to see if the
for this and
previous excellent contributions to CA.
Barry
-Original Message-
From: Cees Hek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 8:16 AM
To: cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net
Subject: [cgiapp] RFC: CGI::Application::Plugin::Auth
Hi All,
I am finally starting up work on the Authentication
Cees Hek wrote:
Hi All,
I am finally starting up work on the Authentication plugin for
CGI::App again. This is purely an interface for Authentication.
Authorization will will be handled in a separate (related) plugin.
What I have done this time is generate documentation and usage
examples
On 9/1/05, Rhesa Rozendaal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will the protected_runmodes() method be additive? Mine is, and it's
probably evident that it should be. What I mean is that if you call it
several times, the new ones are added to the store, they don't replace
the ones from the previous call.
Cees Hek wrote:
DESCRIPTION
CGI::Application::Plugin::Auth adds the ability to authenticate
users in your CGI::Application modules.
I wonder if this plugin shouldn't be called CAP::Authen, rather than
just CAP::Auth. It validates that the user is who he says he is
(authentication),
CGI::Application::Plugin::Auth adds the ability to authenticate
users in your CGI::Application modules.
I wonder if this plugin shouldn't be called CAP::Authen, rather than
just CAP::Auth. It validates that the user is who he says he is
(authentication), but not whether or not
On 9/1/05, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if this plugin shouldn't be called CAP::Authen, rather than
just CAP::Auth. It validates that the user is who he says he is
(authentication), but not whether or not they have access to a given run
mode (authorization).
I'm open to
On 9/1/05, Tim Colson (tcolson) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CGI::Application::Plugin::Auth adds the ability to authenticate
users in your CGI::Application modules.
I wonder if this plugin shouldn't be called CAP::Authen, rather than
just CAP::Auth. It validates that the user is
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:52:06 -0400, Cees Hek wrote:
Hi Cees
As for names, I was going to go with Auth and Authz, but Authen
doesn't sound too bad either. Or maybe go with the full names...
I vote for the full names.
--
Cheers
Ron Savage, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2/09/2005
10 matches
Mail list logo
