[cgiapp] Re: :App, CGI::Session and CGI::Simple

2004-04-28 Thread Mark Stosberg
On 2004-04-28, Ron Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 07:54:50 -0400, Kinyon, Rob wrote: Hi Rob 1) You will want to do that kind of checking when you are handed the object in your constructor. So, you'll have to compile a list of methods the object will need to handle.

Re: [cgiapp] Re: :App, CGI::Session and CGI::Simple

2004-04-28 Thread Ron Savage
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:18:02 + (UTC), Mark Stosberg wrote: Hi Mark As a shorter term solution, would about having a function like: test_for_CGI_compatibility() In it, do something basic with 'param' and 'cookie'. Then, just eval the executation of this test to see if it dies, or returns

[cgiapp] RE: :App, CGI::Session and CGI::Simple

2004-04-27 Thread Kinyon, Rob
While you are correct that the -better- solution is to rely on can(), this still isn't a very good solution. There's two problems I can see off the bat: 1) You will want to do that kind of checking when you are handed the object in your constructor. So, you'll have to compile a list of methods