Mark Stosberg wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/cgi-application/
Is it possible to change the design with this? Or will it always look
like every other python powered google code website?
Very little customization is available with Google Code sites, and your point
that it is
http://code.google.com/p/cgi-application/
Is it possible to change the design with this? Or will it always look
like every other python powered google code website?
Very little customization is available with Google Code sites, and your point
that it is Python powered is taken,
one reason for going through something like google groups is that the
membership can come and go and the mail keeps on going. sometimes, after
a few years, the maintainer[s] of the email list will have gone on to
other things, and will need to be bugged to find the time to fix this
relic
Thanks for the feedback, Michael.
I'm fairly much in agreement with all your points about the mailing list
options.
+ A more common SCM system (not darcs). SVN is popular and tolerable. Git is
nice and fast (and with something like github forking and fixing things
becomes
more a
What I talked to Mark about this morning was that I think the nature of how
these projects can be supported is changing. There is a clear multiplicity
of features which are useful, beyond just a mailing list. I've used
Sourceforge, but I find it dated and shaky. Irrational though it may
Jesse Erlbaum wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Jesse Erlbaum je...@erlbaum.net wrote:
Irrational though it may be, I get a much better feeling about something
like Google Code (http://code.google.com) + Google Groups.
This being said:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Lyle webmas...@cosmicperl.com wrote:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Please disregard.
Yes, I apologize for the premature announcement. Let me take is
opportunity to
reframe the conversation, after speaking with Jesse who has now repaired
the
original mailing list.
Hi All --
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Michael Peters mpet...@plusthree.comwrote:
Things I want:
+ Reliable
+ Easy to use
+ A more common SCM system (not darcs). SVN is popular and tolerable. Git
is nice and fast (and with something like github forking and fixing things
becomes more a
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Jesse Erlbaum je...@erlbaum.net wrote:
Irrational though it may be, I get a much better feeling about something
like Google Code (http://code.google.com) + Google Groups.
This being said:
http://code.google.com/p/cgi-application/
Just playing around.
I like Google Groups + Google Code. A good example would be what Rose
has done:
http://code.google.com/p/rose/
- Jason
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Please disregard.
Yes, I apologize for the premature announcement. Let me take is opportunity to
reframe the conversation, after speaking with Jesse
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Please disregard.
Yes, I apologize for the premature announcement. Let me take is opportunity to
reframe the conversation, after speaking with Jesse who has now repaired the
original mailing list.
Performance issues aside, I think it's time that we consider moving to
On 5/6/2009 2:02 PM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
Which features are important to you? Are there particular services you
recommend? We'll gather input for a few days and make a decision.
well, i have very limited requirements:
- mail gets delivered and archived
i've never been too fond of web
Mark Stosberg wrote:
It provides a number of features including built-in archiving, web-based list
management, RSS feeds, web-based posting and more. It's also written in Perl,
with parts done in CGI::Application.
We could also consider a commodity platform like a Google Group or similar.
13 matches
Mail list logo
