On Tue, 7 May 2002, Cory Trese wrote:
> Is this patch against 2.3 or a previous version?
Yup, 2.3.
> > I don't think this will break any existing code but it does constitute a
> > change in functionality. Can anyone think of a case where this would be
> > the wrong behavior?
>
> Well, what is
This patch is great. I have always been a little confused as to why the
TMPL_PATH used some type of prepending logic. I think this patch adds
synergy to the two module's relationship.
> Here's a patch that sets TMPL_PATH using the HTML::Template path option
> rather than prepending it using a s
Here's a patch that sets TMPL_PATH using the HTML::Template path option
rather than prepending it using a string. This removes the restriction
that all paths must end in $ENV{IFS}. Also, it allows the TMPL_PATH
setting to coexist with other potential search paths for templates
(i.e. $ENV{HTML_TE
