2014-08-12 16:15 GMT-03:00 John Keeping :
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:38:35PM -0300, Damián Nohales wrote:
>> Ah... I got it.
>>
>> We could implement cache disabling per command to disable it for the
>> plain command. I don't know if there is another way since Etag is
>> calculated at command exe
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:38:35PM -0300, Damián Nohales wrote:
> Ah... I got it.
>
> We could implement cache disabling per command to disable it for the
> plain command. I don't know if there is another way since Etag is
> calculated at command execution.
Another way to do it would be to only h
Ah... I got it.
We could implement cache disabling per command to disable it for the
plain command. I don't know if there is another way since Etag is
calculated at command execution.
2014-08-12 6:00 GMT-03:00 John Keeping :
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 07:45:53PM -0300, Damián Nohales wrote:
>> (S
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 07:45:53PM -0300, Damián Nohales wrote:
> (Sorry, I forgot to include the list address in my response.)
>
> This does not interact with CGit's cache at all, this interacts with
> client side cache.
>
> If the client sends an Etag it means "Hey, I have the content cached
>
