On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:45:34PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:04:16PM +, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
> > See: a24995bf8c55114044d6baf32ad5e8c3a04d924d
>
> You can't do this, the commit hash will be different when the patch is
> applied from an email.
Oops. Sometimes
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 08:57:52PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> "generally recognized" is a bit nebulous, which is why a blanket policy
> is safer as well as much simpler to police.
Guess we are going to wait for this bit to rot here over a silly blanket
policy then, as I have established my
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:56:19PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> I think we need to fix all of those as well if we're going to claim to
> be HTML rather than XHTML. I suspect that would be a bit big to review
> as a single patch, but I certainly think that it should be applied as a
> single patch
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:04:18PM +, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
> The name attribute is optional in an input element, but it must not be
> an empty value.
>
> See: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#attr-fe-name
> See: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#the-input-element
Again, sign-off is needed, but
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:04:16PM +, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
> See: a24995bf8c55114044d6baf32ad5e8c3a04d924d
You can't do this, the commit hash will be different when the patch is
applied from an email.
> This reverts commit 3c53ebfb57a5dba8fc65b2f99ebbfb635e34.
Same comments apply as
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:04:15PM +, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
> vcs-git is not a registered keyword. This microformat does not seem to
> be very popular and will throw errors in HTML validators.
>
> Because the element leaves us with no sensible rel attribute to
> use, there's no reason to
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:50:09PM +, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
> ---
> This may be a little controversial, but right now is there a reason not
> to do this?
No, I think this makes sense (although again we need your
signed-off-by).
Reviewed-by: John Keeping
> ui-shared.c
See: a24995bf8c55114044d6baf32ad5e8c3a04d924d
This reverts commit 3c53ebfb57a5dba8fc65b2f99ebbfb635e34.
---
ui-shared.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ui-shared.c b/ui-shared.c
index 1ded2d6..ba11c55 100644
--- a/ui-shared.c
+++ b/ui-shared.c
@@ -703,15
Feel free to cherry-pick some commits. Some are bug fixes, some are
changes in functionality. This branch is still incomplete, but I'd like
to hear feedback on it.
Juuso Lapinlampi (5):
ui-shared: HTML-ize DOCTYPE and
Revert "ui-summary: add "rel='vcs-git'" to clone URL links"
Revert
The action attribute must "a valid non-empty URL potentially surrounded
by spaces."
See: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#the-form-element
---
ui-shared.c | 2 +-
ui-stats.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ui-shared.c b/ui-shared.c
index 9a38aa9..0b7fdec
vcs-git is not a registered keyword. This microformat does not seem to
be very popular and will throw errors in HTML validators.
Because the element leaves us with no sensible rel attribute to
use, there's no reason to keep this.
For future consideration, microdata should be marked with
Get rid of the XHTML headers, bringing cgit slowly to the modern age of
HTML.
---
ui-shared.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ui-shared.c b/ui-shared.c
index 9a38aa9..1ded2d6 100644
--- a/ui-shared.c
+++ b/ui-shared.c
@@ -12,8 +12,7 @@
#include "html.h"
---
This may be a little controversial, but right now is there a reason not
to do this?
ui-shared.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ui-shared.c b/ui-shared.c
index 9a38aa9..d9541f0 100644
--- a/ui-shared.c
+++ b/ui-shared.c
@@ -792,13 +792,11 @@ void
13 matches
Mail list logo