"Jason A. Donenfeld" on Sat, 2019/02/09 12:31:
> Wouldn't strlcat be the more apt replacement?
Looks like strlcat requires to link against libbsd. I do not think we
want that, no?
--
main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/*Best regards
"Jason A. Donenfeld" on Sat, 2019/02/09 12:31:
> You sure those statements are the same? Snprintf doesn't append like
> strncat. Wouldn't strlcat be the more apt replacement?
We have an unconditional
result[0] = '\0';
that mad be think it is safe. But we are inside a loop, so probably not... :-
You sure those statements are the same? Snprintf doesn't append like
strncat. Wouldn't strlcat be the more apt replacement?
--
Sent from my telephone.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 22:49 Christian Hesse From: Christian Hesse
>
> Git version v2.21.0 marks strncat() as banned (commit
> ace5707a803eda0f1dd
From: Christian Hesse
Git version v2.21.0 marks strncat() as banned (commit
ace5707a803eda0f1dde3d776dc3729d3bc7759a), so replace it.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hesse
Reviewed-by: John Keeping
---
ui-ssdiff.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ui-ssdiff.c b/
