On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:09:26PM -0700, Josh wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:46 PM
> To: 'Adam Langley'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: freeent
>
> HA HA HA
> Trolling means I'm trying to
-Original Message-
From: Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:46 PM
To: 'Adam Langley'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:freeent
HA HA HA
Trolling means I'm trying to get them into my nets? No... I'm hiring
this thing built, by pro's li
Tavin Cole:
> For example, there are a lot of points in the DMCA that would protect
> node operators in the US, provided that they comply with orders to block
> certain files.
Sanctioning this behavior is unacceptable, because it invites more
organized censorship, like master lists of blocked or
Hi all,
I need *your* ideas!
I've just read through a government discussion paper at
http://www.med.govt.nz/buslt/int_prop/digital/index.html which will be used
as a basis for updating New Zealand's Copyright Act for the digital age.
On first reading, it appears that the NZ Ministry of Economic
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:32:05PM -0400, Todd Wallace wrote:
> > your node without a list of keys to check one by one. It would be very
> > hard to make a case against you based on your failure to censor
> > material you couldn't possibly have had knowledge of. Once again we
> > arrive at the c
> your node without a list of keys to check one by one. It would be very
> hard to make a case against you based on your failure to censor
> material you couldn't possibly have had knowledge of. Once again we
> arrive at the conclusion that you can protect yourself by complying
> with legal orde
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:23:42PM -0400, Todd Wallace wrote:
> >> I would hate to be the poor fool who has an example made of him for
> >> some Senate hearing.
> >
> > Better get rid of your TV set too.
>
> No, I think the Senate hearings would portray it differently:
>
> "So, you mean to say
those security cams from singapore will know that you are infact a pedophile.
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Porn on Freenet
> >> I would hate to be the poor fool wh
>> I would hate to be the poor fool who has an example made of him for
>> some Senate hearing.
>
> Better get rid of your TV set too.
No, I think the Senate hearings would portray it differently:
"So, you mean to say, you set up the computer, you connected it to the
Internet, you put software
Mr. Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I wonder what congress thinks it has a hope in hell of
> accomplishing against P2P porn, file sharing, etc.
Lobbyist: "Hello, Senator. I'd like to talk about piracy."
Senator: "You mean people who copy music and movies without paying for
them?"
Lobbyist
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 01:39:11PM -0400, Todd Wallace wrote:
> I'm still struggling to get my Freenet node up and running, but now I'm
> having second thoughts. I visited a Freenet node last week via the web, and
> I looked at some "keys" (I think) and a bunch of porn was prominently
> listed.
to chatfreenet. i would like to know :what nex ? shall i do
ana
___
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
I'm still struggling to get my Freenet node up and running, but now I'm
having second thoughts. I visited a Freenet node last week via the web, and
I looked at some "keys" (I think) and a bunch of porn was prominently
listed.
I would hate to be the poor fool who has an example made of him for
--- Jeremy G Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And that's the whole point of the report Mr.
> Largent and I are
> releasing today." He also said that in comparison,
> the debate
> over the V-Chip is "trivial."
There are still v-chip debates? Sheesh, great to see
my tax dollars at work.
I w
--- Tavin Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:35:37PM -0700, Josh
> wrote:
< Borg ramblings deleted >
>
> You need professional help.
Nah, he'd be right at home at any Trek con :)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international call
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy G Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, July 30, 2001 9:47 AM
Subject: [freenet-chat] p2p = child-endangerment
<>
> " . . . In this case, parental awareness and parental involvement matter
more than legislation
>--
House Report Concludes P2P Networks Endanger Children
7/27. The Minority Staff of the Special Investigations Division
of the House Committee on Government Reform released a report
[ http://www.house.gov/reform/min/pdf/pornp2p.pdf ] titled
"Children's Access to Pornography Through Int
17 matches
Mail list logo