Re: [freenet-chat] FW: freeent

2001-07-30 Thread Travis Bemann
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:09:26PM -0700, Josh wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:46 PM > To: 'Adam Langley' > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: freeent > > HA HA HA > Trolling means I'm trying to

[freenet-chat] FW: freeent

2001-07-30 Thread Josh
-Original Message- From: Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:46 PM To: 'Adam Langley' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:freeent HA HA HA Trolling means I'm trying to get them into my nets? No... I'm hiring this thing built, by pro's li

Re: [freenet-chat] Porn on Freenet

2001-07-30 Thread Mark J. Roberts
Tavin Cole: > For example, there are a lot of points in the DMCA that would protect > node operators in the US, provided that they comply with orders to block > certain files. Sanctioning this behavior is unacceptable, because it invites more organized censorship, like master lists of blocked or

[freenet-chat] Need YOUR Ideas

2001-07-30 Thread David McNab
Hi all, I need *your* ideas! I've just read through a government discussion paper at http://www.med.govt.nz/buslt/int_prop/digital/index.html which will be used as a basis for updating New Zealand's Copyright Act for the digital age. On first reading, it appears that the NZ Ministry of Economic

Re: [freenet-chat] Porn on Freenet

2001-07-30 Thread Tavin Cole
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:32:05PM -0400, Todd Wallace wrote: > > your node without a list of keys to check one by one. It would be very > > hard to make a case against you based on your failure to censor > > material you couldn't possibly have had knowledge of. Once again we > > arrive at the c

Re: [freenet-chat] Porn on Freenet

2001-07-30 Thread Todd Wallace
> your node without a list of keys to check one by one. It would be very > hard to make a case against you based on your failure to censor > material you couldn't possibly have had knowledge of. Once again we > arrive at the conclusion that you can protect yourself by complying > with legal orde

Re: [freenet-chat] Porn on Freenet

2001-07-30 Thread Tavin Cole
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:23:42PM -0400, Todd Wallace wrote: > >> I would hate to be the poor fool who has an example made of him for > >> some Senate hearing. > > > > Better get rid of your TV set too. > > No, I think the Senate hearings would portray it differently: > > "So, you mean to say

Re: [freenet-chat] Porn on Freenet

2001-07-30 Thread scum
those security cams from singapore will know that you are infact a pedophile. - Original Message - From: "Todd Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:23 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Porn on Freenet > >> I would hate to be the poor fool wh

Re: [freenet-chat] Porn on Freenet

2001-07-30 Thread Todd Wallace
>> I would hate to be the poor fool who has an example made of him for >> some Senate hearing. > > Better get rid of your TV set too. No, I think the Senate hearings would portray it differently: "So, you mean to say, you set up the computer, you connected it to the Internet, you put software

Re: [freenet-chat] p2p = child-endangerment

2001-07-30 Thread Greg Wooledge
Mr. Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I wonder what congress thinks it has a hope in hell of > accomplishing against P2P porn, file sharing, etc. Lobbyist: "Hello, Senator. I'd like to talk about piracy." Senator: "You mean people who copy music and movies without paying for them?" Lobbyist

Re: [freenet-chat] Porn on Freenet

2001-07-30 Thread Tavin Cole
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 01:39:11PM -0400, Todd Wallace wrote: > I'm still struggling to get my Freenet node up and running, but now I'm > having second thoughts. I visited a Freenet node last week via the web, and > I looked at some "keys" (I think) and a bunch of porn was prominently > listed.

[freenet-chat] posting to this list

2001-07-30 Thread ana santos
to chatfreenet. i would like to know :what nex ? shall i do ana ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

[freenet-chat] Porn on Freenet

2001-07-30 Thread Todd Wallace
I'm still struggling to get my Freenet node up and running, but now I'm having second thoughts. I visited a Freenet node last week via the web, and I looked at some "keys" (I think) and a bunch of porn was prominently listed. I would hate to be the poor fool who has an example made of him for

Re: [freenet-chat] p2p = child-endangerment

2001-07-30 Thread Mr. Smith
--- Jeremy G Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And that's the whole point of the report Mr. > Largent and I are > releasing today." He also said that in comparison, > the debate > over the V-Chip is "trivial." There are still v-chip debates? Sheesh, great to see my tax dollars at work. I w

Re: [freenet-chat] for the record

2001-07-30 Thread Mr. Smith
--- Tavin Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:35:37PM -0700, Josh > wrote: < Borg ramblings deleted > > > You need professional help. Nah, he'd be right at home at any Trek con :) __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international call

Re: [freenet-chat] p2p = child-endangerment

2001-07-30 Thread Timm Murray
-Original Message- From: Jeremy G Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, July 30, 2001 9:47 AM Subject: [freenet-chat] p2p = child-endangerment <> > " . . . In this case, parental awareness and parental involvement matter more than legislation

[freenet-chat] p2p = child-endangerment

2001-07-30 Thread Jeremy G Byrne
>-- House Report Concludes P2P Networks Endanger Children 7/27. The Minority Staff of the Special Investigations Division of the House Committee on Government Reform released a report [ http://www.house.gov/reform/min/pdf/pornp2p.pdf ] titled "Children's Access to Pornography Through Int