even if it was
added at all into 0.3, but I'm pretty sure it was. I need keep up with
whats going on in CVS better).
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Reich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [freene
Chad Phillips ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Would it be hard for an ISP to block out just Freenet traffic?
Yes, because Freenet runs on arbitrary TCP/IP ports. (The plurality of
nodes are running on port 19114, because some of the Freenet packages
default to that, but there are a great number of
FYI, I am writing a paper on freenet for a copyright law class. So most of
my questions are purely academic.
>Actually, this whole discussion is moot -- if I wanted to search a known
>node for a file, I would just do
> freenet_request -h 1 -s tcp/XX.XX.XX.XX:Y KEY tempfile
Wouldn't this gr
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 07:09:09PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> freenet_request -h 1 -s tcp/XX.XX.XX.XX:Y KEY tempfile
Doesn't freenet put some uncertainty into the HTL value? IIRC even
a HTL 1 request might end up going to some other nodes as well.
--
Leo Howell
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:58:15PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Chad Phillips ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > One "what if" I was thinking about is lets say the RIAA compiles a list of
> > keys of copyrighted works and then randomly picks node operators and tries
> > to legally force them to ch
Stefan Reich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >(1) Where's their search warrant?
>
> They don't necessarily need one (see David's scary story about spineless
> providers in New Zealand).
Cutting access is bad, but it's not the same as forcing you to divul
From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>(1) Where's their search warrant?
They don't necessarily need one (see David's scary story about spineless
providers in New Zealand).
>(2) frequest KSK@some/file/that/they/want/to/delete.mp3 foo.mp3
>finsert KSK@the/same/file/with/a/different/name.m
Chad Phillips ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> One "what if" I was thinking about is lets say the RIAA compiles a list of
> keys of copyrighted works and then randomly picks node operators and tries
> to legally force them to check for these keys.
(1) Where's their search warrant?
(2) frequest KSK@
ISP's into blocking
freenet traffic (I guess you could do this by blocking all but a few ports
used for regular web surfing).
Any thoughts on this?
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Finding a key on your node
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, that is very easy to do. You don't even need to look
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 11:05:53AM -0500, Chad Phillips wrote:
> I have read the docs on how freenet works, but I am still a little unclear
> on one thing. You shouldn't be able tell what is stored on your node
> because everything is hashed.
You can't get a list of everything that is on your no
Yes, that is very easy to do. You don't even need to look 'inside' your
node; just say
frequest -htl 1 KSK@company/topsecret
That particular company won't gain a lot though, even if they manage to
have many node operators delete that file - if the content is
interesting in any way, there w
I have read the docs on how freenet works, but I am still a little unclear
on one thing. You shouldn't be able tell what is stored on your node
because everything is hashed.
Is it possible to easily find out if a specific key is on your node. Say
company x calls you and says file "top secret" h
12 matches
Mail list logo
