Hi all,
We get the following error when executing a query:
org.alfresco.scripts.ScriptException: 01010002 Failed to execute script
'classpath*:alfresco/templates/webscripts/org/alfresco/cmis/queries.post.cmisquery.js':
01010001 Selector must be specified for child constraint (IN_TREE) and join
Hi Geert,
First of all, this an Alfresco question and not an OpenCMIS question. The
Alfresco CMIS forum would be a better place for those kind of issues.
Your query is missing a qualifier parameter in the IN_TREE function. This
parameter is mandatory for queries that do JOINs.
(See CMIS
Hi Florian,
Sorry for the misplaced question, but thanks for the reference to the section
in the CMIS specifications! It solved our problem.
Kind regards,
Geert Mano
- Original Message -
From: Florian Müller florian.muel...@alfresco.com
To: g vanheusden g.vanheus...@aca-it.be
Cc:
Just an FYI in case you are wondering. The vote to approve the cmislib 0.4
incubating release was sent to the IPMC a week ago and has still only received
one binding vote (Nick's). I sent a second reminder to the general incubator
group today so hopefully that will cause something to happen.
Hi Jeff,
There was a -1 vote [1]. I guess you have to start over...
- Florian
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201101.mbox/%3CAANLkTinERWvEEdW6e2YQ+hnnFSzNx3xL-qDq91S=v...@mail.gmail.com%3E
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Potts jeffpott...@gmail.com
To:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Florian Müller wrote:
There was a -1 vote [1]. I guess you have to start over...
Alas yes. If you want, I can give you a hand tomorrow my afternoon / your
morning to fix these problems. Hopefully this'll then be the last time...
Nick
BTW, I have no idea WTF is a IPMC, and who is and who is not.
S.
On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Jeff Potts wrote:
Just an FYI in case you are wondering. The vote to approve the cmislib 0.4
incubating release was sent to the IPMC a week ago and has still only
received one binding vote
Sorry, Stefane, you are correct, I should have counted your vote. I guess with
the -1 from Stefan Seelmann it is moot. I also agree with you that looking
through the archives is not a great way to count votes.
Richard, I hope you're taking notes on this whole thing so that when you do the
PHP
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jeff Potts wrote:
Sorry, Stefane, you are correct, I should have counted your vote. I
guess with the -1 from Stefan Seelmann it is moot. I also agree with you
that looking through the archives is not a great way to count votes.
If you were subscribed to general@incubator
On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:39 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jeff Potts wrote:
Sorry, Stefane, you are correct, I should have counted your vote. I guess
with the -1 from Stefan Seelmann it is moot. I also agree with you that
looking through the archives is not a great way to count
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:39 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jeff Potts wrote:
Sorry, Stefane, you are correct, I should have counted your vote. I
guess with the -1 from Stefan Seelmann it is moot. I also agree with
you that looking through
11 matches
Mail list logo