Shouldn't NTLMAuthenticationProvider be named
JavaNetAuthenticationProvider, or something like that? There's
actually nothing NTLM-specific about it...
Florent
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:11 AM, f...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fmui
Date: Thu Sep 23 09:11:58 2010
New Revision: 1000365
URL:
If there are no other use cases besides NTLM than I guess the current
name is ok.
Florent
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Florian Müller
florian.muel...@alfresco.com wrote:
Well, it's the only way to get Javas build-in NTLM support to kick in. It
also supports HTTP basic authentication but
