He are some areas that we can work on to improve talk quality.
>
> 1)Ask the speakers to submit slides 3 days before the event. (We used to
do
> that.) The idea is to ensure that the speakers is prepared well ahead of
the
> event.
>2) Better timekeeping during the event. Ensure that the talks do
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Vijay Kumar wrote:
> If the feedback is about how better to organize Chennaipy events, it will be
> useful to us (the organizers). But if the feedback is about the talk, then
> it will be useful only for the speaker. It would be better
>
> Let's give this at shot at Oct's meetup. I can take the lead on this
> and figure out the logistics on passing the links on, etc.
>
>
It's not that late this time. You can paste the link on mailing list and
meetup page. Just a suggestion.
Thanks
___
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Gaurav Sehrawat
wrote:
>
> It just occured to me we stopped asking for feedback from attendees. IMHO
> feedback is important not just for organizers but for the speakers too.
>
> As always there are ton of channels for feedback like
> I definitely won't emphasize and recommend on experience and usage.
Yes, I was trying to convey the same thing.
> Please don't take "some attendee's" feedback in negative way.
I wasn't talking about me :), Just trying to tell we may not know how the
newcomers will take it if we post feedbacks
Yes, there should be some channel for feedback on talk.
About the "some attendee's" feed back :
"Talks were prepared just out from learning and didn't arise from
experience/usage/real use-cases",
IMHO, no one has to be experienced to give a talk on stage. Mostly when
people learn something new,
It just occured to me we stopped asking for feedback from attendees. IMHO
feedback is important not just for organizers but for the speakers too.
Quick context: Some attendee mentioned to me that "Talks were prepared just
out from learning and didn't arise from experience/usage/real use-cases".