Hi Ogoshi
$ echo "text/plain { suffixes txt }" > /etc/cherokee/mime.conf
$
I would rather use a ">>" instead of a single ">" unless you want to
remove all the previous contents of mime.conf ;-)
$ echo "text/plain { suffixes txt }" >> /etc/cherokee/mime.conf
$
the ">>" appends (does not destroy
Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
Anyway, the main idea is right. To add a new mime type, it is enough
to append a line in the mime.conf file. :-)
I would also say that the original command does the job (TM). It does
add the mime type for .txt :-)
Thanks for pointing out that issue.
No problemo ;-
Hi,
I have found a couple of memory leaks in the error management code of
the epoll init function.
This patch fixes them.
Best regards.
P.S: Keep up the good work
--- cherokee-0.4.20.old/cherokee/fdpoll-epoll.c 2005-04-22 18:29:24.0 +0100
+++ cherokee-0.4.20/cherokee/fdpoll-epoll.c 2005-0
Great news.
Last Friday I installed a fresh Debian unstable. Today I installed
Cherokee and I found two little problems.
1.- After the install, the system tries to start Cherokee and fails
because it says it was already started ( that is impossible as it's the
first time it's installed ). A /et
Hi Gunnar,
all problems are fixed in the latest debian cherokee packages. Thanks
By the way, very nice the new default welcome page ;-)
Regards,
Rodrigo
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Rodrigo Fernandez-Vizarra dijo [Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:39:13AM +0100]:
Great news.
Last Friday I installed a fresh Debian
Hi,
This patch completes the support of Solaris 10 event ports for Cherokee.
I guess Cherokee is the first ever web server with Solaris 10 event
ports!! . Thanks to Cherokee's modular architecture it was very easy to
do. Congratulations Alo.
Best regards,
Rodrigo
--- cherokee-0.4.22.old/cheroke
Hi again,
please find attached a patch for the patch to fix a bug in the fix ;-)
Regards,
Rodrigo
Rodrigo Fernandez-Vizarra wrote:
Hi,
This patch completes the support of Solaris 10 event ports for
Cherokee. I guess Cherokee is the first ever web server with Solaris
10 event ports!! . Thanks to
nyone wants to try it in FreeBSD and
provide feedback will be appreciated.
Enjoy.
Rodrigo
/* -*- Mode: C; tab-width: 8; indent-tabs-mode: t; c-basic-offset: 8 -*- */
/* Cherokee
*
* Authors:
* Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Rodrigo Fernandez-Vizarra <[E
Hi Jens,
those are good news. Thank you for sharing them with us. It's nice to
know were Cherokee is being used. For sure knowing that Alo's "little
kid" is progressing so good makes him very happy.
Regards,
Rodrigo
Jens Körner wrote:
Hi,
just wanted to report the web based (german) ERP a
Sébastien Arnaud wrote:
I will try to take a look at it. Anyway, if someone has it running
it in *BSD with kqueue(), please let me know how is it working.
I would, but I am not sure how easy it is to install one of the *BSD
on my powerbook. I see that FreeBSD 6 RC1 has added again PPC su
Hi guys,
I have spend little time having a look at the performance problem with
kqueue but I have build a patch that improves the situation. It's still
not as fast as poll but it's near.
I would appreciate if you guys can give it a try and provide me with
some feedback (mainly that it still
e how
this compares. What kind of performance increase did the patch you
submit yield on your machine?
Thanks!
Sébastien
On Oct 28, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Rodrigo Fernandez-Vizarra wrote:
Hi guys,
I have spend little time having a look at the performance problem
with kqueue but I have bu
Sébastien Arnaud wrote:
This is great news as well! Actually Apple released 10.4.3 today and
the kqueue bug is gone!!! Performance of the OS are actually up a
notch as well (~10% as far as cherokee is concerned). On my machine
benchmarking the small default cherokee page at 10 concurrency g
Hi,
hopefully this patch will allow us to compile cherokee in DragonFlyBSD.
Regards,
Rodrigo
--- cherokee-0.4.29.old/configure.in2005-11-10 17:14:56.0 +
+++ cherokee-0.4.29/configure.in2005-11-11 15:36:06.0 +
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
thread_ldflags="-
Hi,
I wrote a new patch to fix the performance problem of kqueue. I made
some tests to measure the performance. Unfortunately I don't have a BSD
system so I used a qemu installation of NetBSD 2.0.2.
Summary:
Poll:
Requests per second:231.18 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per reques
15 matches
Mail list logo