If there was need to confirm your insanity, we've got it now.
Good work! This is dead useful me, I'll go through the ebuilds I have
now and check the licenses.
You're still utterly barking though ^^
Cheers,
Leo
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
High Priority: NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY
IMO you are overreacting...
cgi-util: missing licence from metafile and all source files. (shawn)
That would be a different Shawn, I guess.
dbus: missing setup file, missing
Okay, I see what you mean now. I think it might be possible to
introduce separate actions or stages in chicken-setup, but I do not
want to make any more changes right now, because I need to deal with
the side-effects of introducing the -install-prefix option.
I believe it would be easy to
On 09/03/2008, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I see what you mean now. I think it might be possible to
introduce separate actions or stages in chicken-setup, but I do not
want to make any more changes right now, because I need to deal with
the side-effects of introducing the
I'd like to suggest two changes to the release management process that
would make everyone's life easier.
1. Change the numbering system so that it includes a serial `build
number';
thus release 3.0.2 might be renumbered as 3.0.2/1073 (I chose the
slash so
that a build number wouldn't look
theres a (hidden) tag you should put in the meta files if its not ready
for release.
-elf
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
High Priority: NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY
IMO you are overreacting...
cgi-util:
